this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
257 points (87.7% liked)

Funny

6824 readers
424 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sukhmel 35 points 11 months ago

Gives me this vibe

animation of fox licking window glass as seen from inside the window

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even in a quiet community as small as lemmy the incels will come out to hate on anything an attractive woman does. This is actually pretty funny and she seems like fun. Get your "upvoted because boobs" negativity out of here. Believe it or not pretty women can be capable of quality content as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

What is this hot take? Am I missing details? I haven't seen any incel hate here. Is it buried in the comments or an OP issue?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Here in Canada we got rid of our pennies years ago. For good reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

weve got 5c paper banknotes issued in 2022

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

There's loads of currency denominations we could get rid of. We could probably just do away with the whole idea of fractions of a currency unit and just make everything 1 pound / euro / dollar

In the past a penny used to get you quite a lot, you might be able to have a meal out for a penny but now it's literally worthless you need at least 50 of them to buy anything reasonable. No one bothers.

The UK used to have half pennies. But then the UK also used to have 144 pennies in 1 pound.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The UK used to have half pennies. But then the UK also used to have 144 pennies in 1 pound.

I gather this is imperial system related.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And/or inbred royals being in charge back then related, I bet..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's the square of a dozen, 12²=144.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

shakes head inbred people and their characteristic love of math..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, Newton was English 🤷...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

True. Boy George too. Also: Vinnie Jones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

12 is arguably a better arithmetic base than 10 since it divides nicely by 2, 3, 4 and 6 instead of just 2 and 5.

[–] sukhmel 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wish some countries would go this way and use 12-based as a default, while others would use 8-based because it's closer to computers, and others will continue using 10-based.

And then no-one will denote the system used because it's the default, how's that you don't understand. Oh what a beautiful world we'd be living in 🥰

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The point is that there are benefits to several different arithmetic bases for different purposes and forming some kind of dogma around any of them is weird.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, there isn't a perfect one... better just agree on using one, whichever that might be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agree, so we will all just use hexadecimal since it is a convenient way to represent both fixed point and floating point arithmetic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm down with that if everyone else is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Username does (not) check out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Ah, ASCII runs deep in this one I see 🫡.

[–] sukhmel 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is no dogma, when doing maths you're free to use anything even as esoteric as Fibonacci base. The problem is when this becomes widespread but not everywhere.

If you're for using it "for different purposes" I can't even understand the point of your original comment, why preach?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I am definitely not the one being preachy about a particular base. I am the one advocating flexibility over dogma.

All I did was point out that 12 is easier to divide cleanly than ten, and this very simple fact has pissed many people off for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, I do agree with that. It just takes time getting used to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If only we had a way to have numbers smaller than 1.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Right, having more whole, proper fractions to work with can also be simpler (and more precise) than truncating decimals and dealing with the implications of significant figures. I just don't understand why people are so hostile to this as a basic idea. Base 12 has benefits, just like base ten does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yup. Keep the quarter and cut everything else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

144? It was 240. 12 pence to a shilling, 20 shillings to a pound sterling. https://www.ecosia.org/search?q=predecimalisation%20pound