this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
124 points (93.7% liked)

Linux

48332 readers
438 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just found about this distro, which is relatively new (2021). Its specificity is that it doesn't features any GNU software by default, which I find interesting.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I see what you did there...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not about GNU being wrong or not, it's about having the choice.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah, you have the choice of have your software be controlled by companies that could just stop licensing it.

But the point of GNU is to disallow closing down sources. Companies don't like that, because it's not profitable. They need non gnu stuff so that they can build money printing closed gardens with it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not using GNU software doesn't mean you don't use any copyleft licenses or GPL.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You're confusing the GPL with GNU

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oof, the most recent news posting is "entering alpha phase" which is a big no thanks for me. In addition, the main descriptive sentence says "It aims to be clean and usable while addressing the various shortcomings of an average Linux distribution." But then doesn't explain that. What does it consider to be shortcomings of an average distro?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's definitely young and not for everyone. But you gotta start somewhere ! I do agree that the "shortcomings" are not explicitly defined, but rather implied in the FAQ.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Alpine is also GNU-free afaik.

EDIT: Except for the GCC toolchain.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a lot of things-free, to be fair

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's kind of the point though, as it's now used as a base for many containers ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Chimera Linux actually uses apk or Alpine Package Keeper as its package manager, they acknowledge this but despite that market themselves as if they did something revolutionary that has never been done before

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

had the same thought, not sure if Alpine is built with LLVM though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yup. It uses GCC toolchain afaik.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's right ! It uses BusyBox as its userland which was my main problem with it (though you can easily install GNU coreutils).

[–] LeFantome 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alpine is still GCC based in the very least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed it seems so.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just use Alpine. Chimera uses Alpine's package manager anyway. The only reason you havent heard about Alpine in this context is because they do not claim they are doing anything revolutionary, they just strive to make a great distro.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alpine is nice, but this one has some differences:

  • LLVM instead of GCC toolchain
  • not so barebones, gives you more ready-to-go installation
  • obviously not so lightweight
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought the whole point of alpine is it's lightweight, given its use in so many docker containers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was stating that this Chimera isn't that lightweight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They are saying these are the difference Chimera has

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I already used alpine for a few years, before containers were a thing. I heard about it exactly because it was advertised as a distro without GNU components, which was revolutionary at the time.

You sound weary with that kind of comment, I wonder what bother you so much about seeing a new distro pop up ?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is kind of intriguing. I like FreeBSD's userland tools a lot better. Have you tried running it? If not, I might see what it's all about. The GNU toolchain is a mixed bag. Some of it is really well documented, some stuff average, and others is just a dog's breakfast.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I only learnt about it today, so I couldn't check it. I have this project of building my own distro using musl and a non GNU userland, and it is a very annoying process, so I felt like I should share this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have been running it for a while. It is mostly awesome.

A non-trivial amount of software assumes Glibc though and so you will have the odd hiccup because of MUSL. I think one of the goals of Chimera is to improve that situation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure, go ahead, use licenses that let Apple steal everything later.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Not using GNU software doesn't mean you don't use any copyleft licenses or GPL.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is good to have a diversity of software. That doesn't make it stupid. Most of the alternatives to GNU programs are GPL licensed anyway.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is patently false. Most alternatives to GNU software are permissively licensed (MIT, BSD, Apache, etc.). Just look at musl, clang, bzip2, and the various “new” userland replacements like ripgrep, neovim, bat, exa, dust, etc. The one notable exception is busybox which is GPL 2.

I don’t know why this trend exists, but I am constantly disappointed that talented young open source devs choose to sacrifice software freedom just because it will make their software easier to integrate in proprietary contexts. This strikes me as pure vanity or greed on the devs part so that their software is more popular and maybe even monetizable.

I hope that trend halts, but time will tell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Arguing over licences to judge how much a piece of software is worth is sterile IMO.

If you personally cannot use software that's not GPL'd, then it's fine. But there's no need to sound condescending like this, it brings absolutely nothing to the table. This could only result in a flame war (and it already is unfortunately, seeing the comments below), which is kind of sad.

So yeah, no prob mate, this is not for you, we get it. See you on the next thread 🫡

[–] LeFantome 6 points 1 year ago

People are going to focus on the GNU free aspect, and I like that about Chimera. That is not the right way to understand the project though.

The creator of Chimera Linux was one of the core contributors to Void Linux. Chimera is an attempt to create a distro with a similar technical philosophy from somebody that thinks they can do better with slightly different choices.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like an interesting systemd free Linux distro and what's not to like about the BSD userland. Thanks for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This means Chimera is not a GNU/Linux system, as it utilizes neither GNU utilities, nor GNU libc, nor GNU toolchain. The system is bootstrappable almost entirely without any GNU components (other than make) and is capable of booting without them (however, most people will have some).

I'd guess they'll move to some bsd make at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good luck with that, with the amount of Programmers that use the Gnuism for make, I would say that no developer can patch that amount of software

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh. That would be huge undertaking indeed.

Let me guess all these makefile generators create gnu-style makefiles too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Didn't know that those projects existed, I have always written makefiles from begining based myself on the dwm makefiles :)

But a quick Google search and the first project that appears say that:

A simple makefile generator that can generate makefiles for: GNU-make targeting MinGW, clang-cl or MSVC.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I could waste a lot of time on this :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I heard about this a little while back. I think it's interesting, and it's nice to see someone try something slightly different. The creator is obviously opinionated about how their distro should work. At least it's not just another debian/ubuntu based distro.

load more comments
view more: next ›