This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Mismanagement and inefficiency must be present everywhere at Google as they do immense amounts of R&D but are constantly beaten to innovation by smaller players.
The video was indeed very impressive, even if not very practical. Not surprised that it's not the actual experience. Not the best move by Google when everybody is already talking about AI hype.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The six-minute video shows off Gemini’s multimodal capabilities (spoken conversational prompts combined with image recognition, for example).
Gemini seemingly recognizes images quickly — even for connect-the-dots pictures — responds within seconds, and tracks a wad of paper in a cup and ball game in real-time.
“That’s quite different from what Google seemed to be suggesting: that a person could have a smooth voice conversation with Gemini as it watched and responded in real-time to the world around it,” Olson writes.
In a situation like this, Olson says Google is “showboating” in order to mislead people from the fact Gemini still lags behind OpenAI’s GPT.
When asked about the validity of the demo, it pointed The Verge to a post from Oriol Vinyals, vice president of research and deep learning lead at Google’s DeepMind (also the co-lead for Gemini), which explains how the team made the video.
That’s certainly one way to approach this situation, but it might not be the right one for Google — which has already appeared, at least to the public eye, to have been caught flat-footed by OpenAI’s enormous success this year.
The original article contains 546 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!