this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
7 points (65.2% liked)

Physics

1341 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Any headline that talks about “stunning”, “shocking”, or “angering” scientists gets an immediate red flag for me, right up there with “breakthrough” battery tech.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

New battery tech shocks scientist after breakingthrough insulated casing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Middle-aged men in white labcoats and with clipboard in hand, using the words "uncanny" and "eerie" in vague sentences.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, and it's particularly obnoxious when they seem to have twisted a quote as an excuse for this: '"This was absolutely stunning to watch first-hand," said materials scientist Brad Boyc.' I'm pretty sure that use of the word means "beautiful", not "shocking."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

This seems really cool, but my two main thoughts when I see something like this are: how badly are they misreporting this, and will anyone bother writing an article about the retraction a few months down the road when it turns out this was something completely different?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"A possible explanation involves a process known as cold welding, which occurs under ambient temperatures whenever metal surfaces come close enough together for their respective atoms to tangle together."

Am i silly or where is the difference? Cold welding is known for a long time, nothing to be stunned about.