this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

News

76 readers
2 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

Mississippi authorities need details on residents who get abortions or gender-affirming care in other states, AG Lynn Fitch said.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love how all of the AGs that signed Fitche’s letter were all males and not a single woman. Not surprising at all. A bunch of ultra-conservative men trying to takes us back to the times when women couldn’t vote or have a bank account by themselves. Kind of disgusting if you ask me.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, and Fourteenth Amendments: "yeah go fuck yourself"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That pesky Equal Protection Clause; always getting in the way of mah' authoritah!

Yet knowing this SCOTUS, they don't care about the fourth, fifth, ninth, tenth, and fourteenth amendments.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Clarence Thomas would overturn 13, 14, and 15 if he could and was paid enough.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservatives don't even need to overturn the ninth. They just flatly ignore it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And damn near everyone ignores the tenth.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This should fall under PII and be a HIPAA violation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It wouldn't be a violation, it would just require due process -- a subpoena or warrant. This is why the DOH is proposing a rule change to prevent sharing of this kind of information entirely.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Oh look, it's the fugitive slave act again.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Creepy fucking voyeurs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never understood states rights and how separating our country into 50 different little countries is a good thing. It puts states at odds and forces the US Judicial system into having to decide. Putting the law deciding back into the hands of the federal government.

Isn’t the whole point that if someone doesn’t agree with the laws of the state they reside they can go to a state that does? It would seem needing to find out who gets an abortion or gender-affirming outside of your state is nobody’s worry. Those people are doing the exact thing conservatives want.

Does Mississippi plan on charging people in other states of committing a crime? Is it to make sure a Mississippi resident doesn’t cross a state border? If so, why? What intentions would the state of Mississippi have with this info if not to prosecute?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because each distinct sovereign state has its own challenges that can't be solved by one blanket overall federal system. The governing challenges that let's say California has are different from the governing challenges Vermont has.

Colonialism had a lot to do with how the governments were organized, so as each colony developed through authorization from England, they had the freedom to govern themselves within certain limitations from The Crown. Each colony developed similar legislatures, based on bicameralism (upper & lower chamber), governor, and then courts. When the Continental Congress came together they recognized each government equally. So there's solid historical reasoning behind why each state is considered their own country.

There was a huge debate at the beginning of the U.S. that eventually realized a combination of Federalism, and individual State Sovereignty. Initially, the Articles of Confederation left a messy system quite like you describe. Yet each state had their own commerce law, would charge fees to cross borders, etc. That system worked terribly due to the fact there was no strong central authority to resolve state differences, so it was scrapped towards a more federalized system that gave stronger power to a central federal government to solve problems, and still left the states enough legal room to govern themselves...The Constitution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the reply but I just don’t see why states need different laws. The time period cited for the need was 250 years ago. I guess that is the conservative modus operandi.

I’m just not convinced that Mississippi having different, worse, healthcare laws is better for the people who live there. Mississippi is choosing to shit their pants, but as a country we all share the smell. Conservatives want to sit in their soiled pants, or the smell, and the rest of us will are horrified.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

aka 'spinning my wheels making bank on a knowingly fruitless task for the publicity'

those poor people in Mississippi deserve better

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And police departments in blue states keep getting caught collaborating with these monsters. Small wonder there's an anti-police movement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Good luck enforcing that. My state isn't in your state's jurisdiction. Go pound sand.

load more comments
view more: next ›