this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
304 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17133 readers
1 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I posted this previously in [email protected], but that community never seemed to pick up any speed, so I hope more people can appreciate this historic tidbit.

This photo (not mine!) is from downtown Stockholm. It takes place in the late 1980's.

To the right, outside of the field of the picture, is an iconic food hall for international cuisine as well as for Swedish fish and crustacean cuisine. To the right, visible in the picture, is "Sergelgången", which is an iconic street in Stockholm between "Hötorget" and "Sergels torg". Also to the left, outside the field of the picture, is the major concert hall (Konserthuset) with its iconic steps that have been graced by both celebrities and random rubes, for warming up in the sun on the otherwise chilly Stockholm streets.

The camera is focused on an iconic Hennes ("hers" in Swedish) store, that was mainly for ladies' fashion. The company that owned Hennes decided to branch out and bought Mauritz, and they ran both ladies' and gentlemen's stores until they brought them together as "Hennes & Mauritz". They were known for poorly made clothes that broke or got broken after a few uses and washes. Their zippers were nationally shamed as proper trash fashion as they broke after one use. Basically, in Sweden they were known for youth or "poor mans" clothes. Popular among students, but once their buyres could afford decent clothes, these went to a land fill (as even the second hand stores refused to stock this crap).

When they decided to go international, they rebranded as H&M, and later HM.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s crazy that from 1826 all the way to 1990 they hadn’t figured out color photos.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The papers (and magazines) mainly printed in B&W. This is, as far as I know, a professional shoot as it was done with a higher resolution than many pics from then.

The colour photos my family took from this time need to be severely colour adjusted to not look as depressing milque/grey/beige colours when we scan them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That is a good point. I forgot newspapers existed. Bigger ones would do color(mostly on Sunday) but yeah, regular pics were black and white.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤣 Why does the pic look like it's from the 1880s? They had color photography in the 1980s. Is that a typo?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The papers (and magazines) mainly printed in B&W. This is, as far as I know, a professional shoot as it was done with a higher resolution than many pics from then.

The colour photos my family took from this time need to be severely colour adjusted to not look as depressing milque/grey/beige colours when we scan them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you have to adjust your idea of what it was like. These are magazines from the 80s, some of the cheapest printing there is. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/63141/11-delightfully-dated-80s-magazines B&W was for artsy pics or cheap books only. I have pics from the 80s that look like they were taken yesterday. I was very young, but color was the norm.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To the right, outside of the field of the picture, is an iconic food hall for international cuisine as well as for Swedish fish and crustacean cuisine.

I'm going to guess that Swedish Fish are not the same thing in Sweden as they are in the US.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Malaco pastellfiskar" or "Malaco-fiskar" used to be a semi-popular candy, that lost their popularity in Sweden in the 1990's. It surprised me and my family a lot when we were abroad, especially in they US (and the Bahamas(!?!?)) that they'd been so popular, as we Swedes didn't like them much in general once we got more candy varieties to choose from.

I am mildly amused with the thought that anyone thought these bland, (very) vaguely fruit flavoured, gelly candies were in any way something that was appreciated in Sweden once we could get international imports.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

theyre so yummy :D

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is Old School Cool catnip.
Is there an active Old School Cool instance around these here parts of the internets?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is H&M still bad quality? What the OP describes is truly epically bad quality. I've never had clothes break or a zipper fail after 1 use. I've never shopped at H&M but I did notice they were fairly cheap.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It´s fast fashion, like many other brands