this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16698 readers
359 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm absolutely baffled Sony didn't make this game free to play already. The more people using those tools and playing those levels the better right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt they'll make it f2p considering there are 0 microtransactions or ways they can make up money for hosting the servers

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Charge for the tools but let the levels be played without a fee? There's so much cool stuff available, but most people will never see it because it's hidden behind the initial cost of purchase.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Before signing up you best check how the payout works. So it's not like Roblox. Encouraged to create within the system but making any money is near impossible, and even when you reach the minimum payout limit, the conversation ratio is insanely bad.

load more comments
view more: next ›