this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

graybeard

239 readers
2 users here now

Stories, links, experiences from calculator manipulators with a few grays in their beard

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was not even aware there's a debate going on. Had anyone asked me before - I would've bet on Itanium having been removed from the tree ages ago!

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

๐Ÿค– I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryAlthough the proposal to remove support for Intel's infamous Itanium architecture - aka Itanic - from Linux was rebuffed in February, just weeks ago, in October, the move was approved for kernel 6.7.

To summarize the summary, when Intel began its EPIC project โ€“ no, really, it stands for Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing [PDF] โ€“ the idea of out of order execution (OoOE) in microprocessors was new, and for x86, unproven.

In brief, the concept of OoOE is that processors can break down complex x86 instructions into smaller, RISC-like chunks, resequence them on the fly to run them as fast as possible, and then reassemble the results into the order that the software originally expected.

In 1994, it wasn't certain that future x86 processors would be able to effectively exploit the instruction level parallelism, or ILP as HP called it [PDF], in machine code.

The Pentium Pro provided the design of the CPU core in the Centrino family of chips from Intel Haifa in Israel, which saved the company from the big, hot, and uncompetitive Netburst architecture of the P4.

The only other VLIW machine that the FOSS desk knows reached the market was Transmeta's Crusoe โ€“ one of our articles about which, ironically, also mentioned Intel's Fred Pollack.


Saved 63% of original text.