this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
177 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

11091 readers
631 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Interestingly, the journal editors have released an expression of concern earlier this year for this article and others by the same author.

SAGE Publishing has been made aware of scientific concerns regarding the work of Dr. Nicholas Guéguen. Multiple concerns have been raised regarding the integrity of the research including but not limited to concerns around data fidelity, replicability of findings, and ethical consent and oversight for studies involving human participants. SAGE Publishing’s Research Integrity Team, in cooperation with this journal's editors, are currently conducting an investigation into these articles.

This expression of concern will remain in place until the investigation is completed and any further needs for appropriate action have been taken.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

We should replicate the tests.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's a valid worry. 😅

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how tf did this receive funding lmao

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

This was in France. Do you need further explanation?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

a regular on retraction watch (highly recommended): https://retractionwatch.com/?s=gueguen

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can we get a Sci Hub link? Not all of us have good library access, or want to enrich publishers who leech the work of scientists who aren't even compensated for it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks for the tips, but like the other poster, I just want a working link. I’m not going to research SciHub replacements to read a single jokey study.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I posted another scihub meme and forgot which I was replying to.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

That Impact Factor drop lmao.