this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
283 points (95.8% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

8814 readers
2 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It would be nice if FTC or someone would sue them for anticompetitive behavior.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And, you know, broke them up into many smaller companies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder to what extent this will help, in the case of YouTube? Its so dominant of that market. Is it purely fiscal or also technical?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It probably would help, as Google couldn’t connect their advertising services that easily with YouTube, and both parties would have to be more independent.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youtube is a money pit. If it had to split from Google, they will need to up monitization pronto or shut down. While I do want Google broken like Bane cracking Batman, there will be casualities. Too many parts of our internet infrastructure exist via subsidization and we use them like utilities. It is going to be messy out there if the FTC succeeds.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If your company need to do illegal shit to exist, your company needs to stop existing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I feel the same way about youtube going as Reddit did. For some of us, it is just a fun thing. Some people need it because it is their best access to knowledge. I worry for those who need it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

There are two US antitrust cases against Google right now:

The first is related to things like paying to be the default search engine on iPhone, Firefox, etc. The second is related to ad tech. Neither really directly addresses the issues that average people have with Google's behavior though, so keep filing complaints!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Google gets sued for this shit all the time, but do you think you're going to hear about this on Google or Youtube?

Case in point, very few people know that they got sued for protecting multiple pedophiles as they were grooming kids on their platform.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Small government has entered the chat

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure I follow.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been noticing this for a while now. I chalked it up to YouTube having ugly code, but now I see that it is simply malicious code.

[–] technom 4 points 1 year ago

Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence*.

  • Except for Google. This is the same company that decided that 'Don't be evil' is inappropriate for them.
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ugh, Google just gets worse and worse...

[–] technom 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, this isn't the first time they did it. There was a thread by a mozilla ex-employee that described how Google destroyed Firefox's market share using the same dirty trick.

[–] andioop 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thread can be read on this article.

YouTube page load is 5x slower in Firefox and Edge than in Chrome because YouTube's Polymer redesign relies on the deprecated Shadow DOM v0 API only implemented in Chrome. You can restore YouTube's faster pre-Polymer design with this Firefox extension: https://t.co/F5uEn3iMLR

— Chris Peterson (@cpeterso) July 24, 2018

According to that article,

Google Chrome ads started appearing next to Firefox search terms. Gmail & [Google] Docs started to experience selective performance issues and bugs on Firefox. Demo sites would falsely block Firefox as 'incompatible'

while Firefox was still a Google search partner.

EDIT: Did not realize how long ago this post was made, whoops.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Adblocks are really fucking them over and it's gratifying seeing chrome uninstalls peaking rn.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Invidious and Piped fix this issue. You can use LibRedirect to automatically redirect all YouTube links to Invidious or Piped.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there's no slowdowns on freetube either

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

FreeTube is great but I personally prefer a browser-based solution

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Going with freetube desktop app (flatpak) on Linux.

No slowdown here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

UntrackMe is nice, but it's not required for YouTube link redirection on Android as LibreTube and NewPipe natively support opening YouTube links.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great if you have those apps installed, but UntrackMe also does twitter -> nitter, reddit -> libreddit, and a few other services too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's true and that's the reason I use UntrackMe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense and improves privacy but they're not going to win on speed, not even on Firefox, unless you host a private instance or use a nearby-hosted one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

By default, when using Invidious, your browser loads the video right from Google, you can proxy videos through the Invidious instance but it's disabled by default. Only Piped always proxies videos through the Piped server.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Just install the chameleon add on and set it to chrome. Problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This doesn't have any impact on video load times on Piped, does it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would it? I don't think your browser makes any direct connection to youtube.com when using Piped, all goes through a proxy server of your choice (hence the name).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Just checking

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this a violation of net neutrality? They are effectively not treating all traffic equally.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All current conversations surrounding Net Neutrality refer to ISPs being neutral. Since this is happening at the browser level, it would not technically be a violation.

For example streaming websites aren't required to support Linux. It's a dick move, but it's not a violation to "block" users.

That isn't to say this isn't a dick move, it absolutely is, but as currently defined it isn't a Net Neutrality issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm, perhaps not net neutrality then, but it could be anti competitive maybe. Like the Internet Explorer fiasco from back in the day.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't notice this, Firefox on Mac, YouTube Premium. Do they only do this for YouTube Free? Yep, seems like it. Terrible nonetheless of course but it explains why I never experienced this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stop giving Google money. Use Invidious, Piped or FreeTube on Desktop, LibreTube or NewPipe on Android, Yattee with this guide on iPhone, iPad or Apple TV.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can also use poptube on ios. Thats what I use.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've never heard of that one, I'll try it out

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's a little weird because its definitely slower on my desktop but on my laptop (with the same account, browser, and extensions) it's perfectly fine. I'm guessing that there's some AB testing going on.