this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
496 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

45573 readers
1410 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's funny that I never considered it, but why would they replace the low wage workers? Capitalism would care most about replacing the high wage workers (except for the CEO and other board members. They obviously are worth every penny and are irreplaceable with ai. ~signed CEO)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

because robots are still 10x cheaper than the low wage workers (in developed countries at least), and low wage worker jobs are usually easier to automate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The high earners' jobs are already mostly replaced by technology, but companies keep employing them and paying them anyway. They mostly schedule meetings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

the issue if you don't employ the smart people, someone else will... and you don't want that typa competition, it is cheaper to just pay them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's important to not call executives workers

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A good AI is the ultimate CEO: tireless, ruthless, informed, fully capable of generating bullshit yet completely immune to others' bullshit. It has no friends, no family, no property, no conflicts of interest, no ego, no drama, no childhood dreams to fulfill, no lovers to impress, and only one ambition: to maximize profit for the company it manages, by any means necessary.

I look forward to finding out whether Wall Street's first loyalty is to aristocracy or to money, because they will soon be forced to choose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If companies made logical decisions, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This happens when capitalists own both labor and the robots.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AI generated content is NOT art

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I disagree with that as a blanket statement. Humans have always used tools to augment our artistic capabilities, and AI is just the newest, shiniest tool. The fact that corps want to replace human artists with machines for cost cutting does not invalidate use cases like an independent singer-wongwriter from generating an album cover for themselves based on their lyrics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You're telling me Planet Mountain Dew isn't a masterpiece?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

We're 10k users. There's not that much content on here. I didn't post almost ever on reddit, but considering we need content, I steal images I find funny off imgur and post them here in an attempt to add content to the network.

If we fragment our 'funny posts' in tens of subreddits from dozens of instances most users aren't subscribed to or don't often browse, we'll have a lot less to keep ourselves entertained.

Instead of trying to gatekeep when we hardly have enough users, why don't you post things you do find appropriate for this subreddit and just scroll past or downvote what upsets you and move on? There's no place or need for this sort of elitism and offering nothing better in return right now.

load more comments
view more: next ›