this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023

8 points (100.0% liked)

C++

1805 readers

2 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

Respect instance rules.
Don't be a jerk.
Please keep all posts related to C++.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

8

Why does the compiler complain about a missing constructor when I'm just resizing my std::vector to a smaller size? (devblogs.microsoft.com)

submitted 1 year ago by gracicot to c/cpp

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Arkaniol 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you. But why not just init the vector std::vector vect(56) And then resize 🧐

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That vector constructor still requires a default constructor for the class of the object contained by the vector, so it's the same issue but different context.