the_dunk_tank

15580 readers

110 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow chapos. Wreckers/CHUDs are allowed. If they aren't banned yet then report them, don't post them.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Bike lanes cause pollution, so we should open another lane to cars (archive.is)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“To have all of us delayed and sitting in burning fossil fuels so some rich people can ride their bikes across the bridge when they feel like it and make me use my inhaler more often, it sucks.”

Several speakers argued that backed-up traffic from the bike path causes pollution — an argument propounded by business leaders in the Bay Area Council, which pushed the argument in online ads calling for converting the bike lane to reduce pollution. Lisa Klein, a Metropolitan Transportation Commission staffer, said that regional air quality officials have assured transportation planners that’s not the case.

In its ad and email campaign, the Bay Area Council also argued that the bike lane benefited wealthy people while the pollution it caused harmed mostly low-income people and communities of color.

The Bay Area Council includes such famous givers-of-a-shit about low-income people as Amazon, Walmart, BlackRock, and McKinsey.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here