this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
37 points (67.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
730 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Does the reddit style format inherently make for a toxic environment? Or is it a culture of toxicity from the influx of reditors? For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. On mastodon, people can't downvote you. These platforms are a joy to use, lemmy is depressing if you post. Its depressing because every post or comment, no mater the quality comes with downvotes, and usually no criticism to accompany it, you are left not knowing if youve made a mistake, or if its just trolls, bots, or idiots. At the end you feel insulted not improved. What do you think?

(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

IDK, I think most of the toxicity comes from when something gets popular. I never read much into the votes on reddit because it's usually more influenced by when you post than what you post. If you combined all the karma of my accounts it'd probably be in the millions but mostly I was just trying to either help people or make them laugh, never cared much about the points.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The karma/upvote/downvote system encourages engagement and gives users an idea of how others perceive their posts. It also encourages people to think about their posts and it helps keep garbage from clogging up the feed.

The problem is that posts are now “attention-centric” and that might lead to people posting stuff that’s more controversial or even “rage-bait” because it gets a reaction.

But honestly though, the toxicity was always there. It’s just that now people express it with an arrow click instead of a flame post calling out the OP’s mom.

I think anonymity or at least the perception of it on the internet breeds toxicity because it’s easier to hurt someone when neither party has to look each other in the eye.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully the instance I'm on doesn't have downvotes. I find what leads to toxic communities is when admins don't remove toxic content or users.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This too. The main reason good mastodon instances are good is that they're strictly curated

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. No rules leads to the worst of the worst.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not necessarily toxicity, but echo chambers. Echo chambers could then be used to be toxic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

At least here in the free world we have to manually build echo chambers and "The Algorithm" does not build them around us without our consent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally core belief that people create and breed the toxicity. Use any system you want if people behave toxic it will become toxic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

a lot of it could be the no-face aspect, we where that a lot

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

NO! YOU SUCK!

More seriously: downvotes can be disabled on Lemmy instances on an instance-by-instance basis. I have them disabled on mine, for example, because I too find them difficult to deal with. If you don't like downvotes, that could be an easy solution for you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think that the current downvote system is far from ideal, and ideally there should have some piece of "forced" feedback when you downvote someone, but keep in mind that a downvote is just "this should be less visible". For example, people often downvote OK answers because an even better answer popped up, and they want the later to rise to the top. So a lot of times there's no actual hostility in the downvotes.

And for other Reddit behaviours that people often call toxic (I call them SNOO - stupid, noisy, obnoxious, obtuse), I think that it's cultural. The Reddit admins bred that behaviour into the users; and users are likely to carry it with them elsewhere, including Lemmy. I think that most of those individuals will get better over time here, and the ones who don't will end leaving.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›