Looks like an admin got compromised. They are in the process of cleaning it up.
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
63 points (98.5% liked)
Fediverse
42 readers
5 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.
founded 1 year ago
if you has account there, maybe, it depends how good is the cryptograph used in the lemmy.world, but if they got hacked, it's means that others intances can too, so be sure to always have a different password for every account, and this is a rule to every account in the internet(you can use good and secure password manager)
Everything can be hacked. In cyber security, it's "when, not if"
Yeah anyone not using randomly generated passwords at this point is just fucking up. I know exactly three of my passwords: the one for my email, the one for my password manager, and the one I'm likely to give out (streaming services and such). The worst anyone can do with the third is cancel my Disney+ or something, and it's really only given to my mom and sisters.
Is salting password hashes so unknown that neither the lemmy devs nor the kbin dev(s?) have implemented it?
Well this was a JWT compromise, I think, but even still people use really bad passwords all the time. A salt is stored with the user record. The salt's job is to invalidate rainbow tables. If you have a collection of a million bad passwords you can check them all salted in a second or two. Obviously that'll depend on the hashing algorithm to an extent.
Looks like Lemmy code has a security vulnerability, persistent XSS, that allows injection of Javascript into the sidebar and comments. That allowed the attacker to force load NSFW content even after lemmy.world admins cleaned up the first attack.
There might have also been an admin account compromise at lemmy.world involved. Time will tell if these are related.
Edit: Looks like the injected JS code also steals login tokens from your browser, so that explains the admin compromise. Probably a good idea to not visit Lemmy sites for time being (or block Javascript in your browser, which is always a good idea).
Gee, who could have thought that allowing html in posts could be bad idea? -Every developer that has ever looked a OWASP.
Definitely looks like a hack. I'd imagine the code has an exploit that someone found
It was an admin account that was compromised. No 2FA was required.
maybe?, but wihy others didn't get hacked at the too?, maybe was social engineering, or the admin got their credentials compromised, we can't be sure yet
Also just because you've installed an instance and it works doesn't mean job done. Could've been simply settings.
Others did get hacked, or are vulnerable to it, but aren't big enough targets?
Beehaw is closed, so they would have had to have an existing account to exploit the same bug (or go through something like Kbin), and Lemmy.world is the biggest Lemmy instance.
Unfortunate if true. Although it is also possible an admin's account was compromised. Would be far less worrying.
It was a compromised admin. https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/168212/Lemmy-world-is-compromised
It did :(
Yes. They got hacked. An admin account got compromised, and the hackers exploited a bug in Lemmy-UI (the web site) that let them do things like redirect users to another site that let them run Javscript. It seems to have let them collect some user tokens from accounts, and access an admin account that way.
If there's a bug in the UI that allows this to happen, there's a bug in the backend too. It looks like they're working on both though
view more: next ›