this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
84 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

This article is very hard to read, there are so many bad comparisons, it feels like the author wants me to be VERY excited for this technology, which most likely means that it's not working, so they farm clicks. Anyone else get that vibe?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think there's a reason this hasn't been done.

I think the EU requires that heat to be used for district heating. I like that idea.

[–] AttackPanda 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don’t see any possible issues with salt solutions near metal components. I mean cars drive through salt all the time and it’s not like they rust. The whole in the floorboard of my car is obviously a feature that was time-delay delivered.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean you could at least read the article before making a low effort comment.

The design doesn’t put any salt solution near computer components, and it doesn’t use the same salt they put on the roads.

It uses lithium bromide, and given this is about large cloud computing server farms and not PCs, they still use heat sinks on the components, but the salt solution is used in a permeable membrane separately that the heat sinks divert heat to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, I haven't read the paper or even the article but it stands to reason that the researchers didn't take into account the common household knowledge that salt equals rust.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I haven’t as the paper or even the article

Thank you for confirming.

The common household isn’t going to see or give a shit about this article in the first place.

It’s not for the common household. It’s for people researching this. and for the companies running cloud computing platforms to save money.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whoosh

Pretty sure they were taking the piss

[–] AttackPanda 1 points 1 year ago

It was admittedly a low effort comment posted exclusively because it made me chuckle. Sometimes it’s the little things in life that make the day worth completing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

the whole in my floor

You don't know the half of it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"We prefer the term progressive unlock"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh shit, we might be getting 30% better CPU/GPU cooling soon?? Epic!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The article was describing a passive cooling solution. As in a cheaper way to cool parts that don't already output borderline unmanageable amounts of heat. Regular watercooling can already keep practically any consumer gpu from getting anywhere near 90c it's just that that's too much work for most people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lost people have no idea what they are missing out on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My fucking phone keyboard autocorrect fights me so hard it's ridiculous

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And expensive. I just priced out a basic WC setup for a GPU using moderate quality parts and flex tubing and it’s $275, and I already have the waterblock for the GPU. For my gaming PC it was easily $500 in additional parts. Pumps, fans, radiators, reservoir, hard tube, and FML decent quality fittings are expensive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do watercooling on a budget. It isn't as cheap as not doing watercooling but I need my parts to last and 95c temps just because "gpus put out lots of heat" is unacceptable.

Don't use that overpriced pc watercool tubing. Use that chemical resistant PVC braided tubing they sell at the hardware store. It's 1/4th the price and better anyway. The $30 universal gpu waterblocks are good enough just pay attention to vram temps. You may have to use something better than thermal glue and tiny heatsinks but on my rx 7700 it's fine.

For coolant I've been using distilled water with ethylene glycol antifreeze instead of overpriced pc watercooling corrosion inhibitor. Experiments I have done have shown it does an even better job and $15 gets you a 1 gallon bottle as opposed to $15 for a 15ml bottle of liquid utopia. 90% distilled water 10% antifreeze is what I use just don't spill it because when it dries it's sticky and smells like pancake syrup.

You still get screwed hard on the fittings. It's not as bad if you only use barbs and hose clamps with the occasional right angle fitting but it's still bad. Hose clamps are ugly but if you use them it's just one less potential leak point. Make sure to get the kind that are tightened via screw so you have complete control over how tight it is.

You still get screwed hard on the pump but a $20 will do the trick if you don't have a lot of radiators. Don't pay $200 for a reservoir just get one that doesn't have a pump built in.

You still get screwed hard on the radiators but try to get the ones that have only copper and no aluminum if you can. Green ethylene glycol antifreeze seems to eliminate problems of using aluminum far better than liquid utopia does but you should still avoid it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that cost is more about it being niche and targeted toward high end gamers than material cost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh for sure.