this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
456 points (99.6% liked)

196

16508 readers
2304 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember, the social Democrats sided with the Nazis over the socialists. They’ve done it every time they’ve been given the opportunity, and will continue to do so as many times as people fall for their shtick.

“The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house."
-Audre Lorde

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

What is true democracy anyway? The government always doing the will of the people? I don't think that can really happen under any circumstances.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would appear that democracy benefits the rulers, as democracy alone has provided the most consistent means for those formerly in power to sleep and die in peace. And the same holds for the courtiers, nomenklatura, and apparatchiks. These sycophants need no longer dread midnight's knife and muffled cries, and the subsequent crowning of a new king. The elite and bureaucracy can retire to their farms and while away their passing years without fear — their riches and posterity intact. As I see it now, democracy is not to the advantage of the demos, it is to the advantage of the power elite. Something to think about.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this your thoughts or a part of a larger quote? I appreciate it, even if I don’t necessarily agree with it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Part of a larger quote, but I agree with it.

I don't like representative democracy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I like representative democracy in theory, our current implementation in the US‡ has a few major issues in that each representative doesn't represent the same amount of people. And we should have a lot more representatives for the people.

Not everyone can dedicate the necessary time to be fully engaged and informed about all the intricacies that come from running a government, so some form of representation is needed. But ~500 people representing around 300 million people is not nearly enough for the national stage IMO.

‡ I'm talking about the US here because that's where I live, but I'm sure other countries have similar issues though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed on your second sentence haha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

more like there can never be true capitalism under democracy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Quibble: They use a definition of democracy which isn't all that democratic: Liberal democracy AKA dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. It's the same trick neoliberals use with freedom (when they say freedom they mean "of markets" NOT "of people") because they know people will assume.

Which is why it's so fucking hilarious that when they don't use a heavily doctrinal definition of democracy the US manages to get their ass completely handed to them by the very countries that this marks as "Authoritarian regimes" because even they represent their people more.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›