this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
238 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

8066 readers
538 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://t.me/DPSUkr/15164

Translation:

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦The USA will supply ATACMS ballistic missiles to Ukraine on a permanent basis and there will be more missiles

Source: Minister of Foreign Affairs Dmytro Kuleba on TV channel 1+1.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Fucking finally.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Russia: Nooo this is a huge mistake, it will surely be terrible for Ukraine!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Finally! Keep in mind these missiles are 30 years old. This is old tech at the end is service life.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

US is literally printing money AND winning a war they're not fighting AND solidifying their geopolitical position. Absolute madmen, Godspeed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

While dubiously hanging dong in the Mediterranean

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Well, they have a lot of experience doing that and benefits for them vastly outweigh the risk.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This will be huge on the Ukrainian front, because it means they can now rapid strike deep into enemy territory.

there will be more missiles

Because the ATACMS come in different flavors of how do you want to fuck with your enemy. Depending if someone is going to fight personnel or armor.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

no, not really, your options is small cluster warhead with longer range or 3x bigger cluster warhead with less range (the one used in berdyansk), neither of which are effective against armour, and then there's unitary variant, which would require direct or almost direct hit. so no, it's only good against soft targets: aircraft on runways (not in hardened hangars or such), SAM sites, ammo depots, radar installations, unarmoured vehicles, troops in the open and so on. unitary variant might be good against command centers

that's still a lot of valuable targets

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Haha, get fucked #Ruzzia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Anything that makes Russia remove invading forces/equipment out of Ukrainian territory is the right move.