this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
171 points (100.0% liked)

News

23014 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Major U.S. pharmacy chain Rite Aid said Sunday that it has filed for bankruptcy and obtained $3.45 billion in fresh financing as it carries out a restructuring plan while coping with falling sales and opioid-related lawsuits.

In 2022, Rite Aid settled for up to $30 million to resolve lawsuits alleging pharmacies contributed to an oversupply of prescription opioids. It said it had reached an agreement with its creditors on a financial restructuring plan to cut its debt and position itself for future growth and that the bankruptcy filing was part of that process.

The plan will “significantly reduce the company’s debt” while helping to “resolve litigation claims in an equitable manner,” Rite Aid said.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Rite Aid got caught knowingly filling illegal and suspicious opioid prescriptions, got slapped with a lawsuit, and now is restructuring.

They fueled the opioid crisis for profit, got caught, and now the courts are bailing them out of their debts

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

On the bright side they put my two local pharmacies out of business.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The debt isn't even that much—the settlements are only about $30 million. The new funding they're getting is over 100x that much.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were they forcing pharmacists to fill suspicious scripts? I'm not putting my license on the line for that shit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

“We allege that Rite Aid filled hundreds of thousands of prescriptions that did not meet legal requirements,” said Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta. “According to our complaint, Rite Aid’s pharmacists repeatedly filled prescriptions for controlled substances with obvious red flags, and Rite Aid intentionally deleted internal notes about suspicious prescribers. These practices opened the floodgates for millions of opioid pills and other controlled substances to flow illegally out of Rite Aid’s stores.”

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndoh/pr/united-states-files-complaint-alleging-rite-aid-dispensed-controlled-substances

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I won’t pretend to know a ton about finance, but I don’t like that so many large companies can get away with going bankrupt and then just “restructuring” instead of going out of business. Maybe it’s actually a good thing, I’m not sure, it definitely seems kinda scummy to me though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Just remember: consequences to your actions are for the poor.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Chapter 11 is basically a debt consolidation plan overseen by the courts. It doesn't wipe out debt, in fact it requires creditors to agree to the plan. It is not just for large companies, small companies use it too.

There is even a version for individuals called Chapter 13. But it's more useful to companies than individuals, since debt consolidation usually involves selling part ownership of the company and that's obviously not an option for individuals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not yet anyway.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Individuals can do this, too. You don't even have to be rich. It's called Chapter 11, and it isn't just for companies. That said, it's just a pause while you restructure your finances and requires an approved get-well plan. Individuals would have a hard time coming up with a get-well plan that doesn't include "get a better job" or "don't pay off this huge debt."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you ran a corporation, you too could benefit from this, but obviously the minority of people are in that situation, and corporations have lobbied for us to spend immense funds supporting that branch of society. They should just go bankrupt, and instead fund the people who will have lost their job, and directly invest there to get them back onto the market.

3500 million dollars to go "figure it out". It's meant for the company to make good by its clients, but we know that's not what's going to happen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean by "that kind of socialism", but rest assured that the $3.5b didn't come from the government. Rite Aid got the money all by itself, mostly by selling off parts of its own business.

The courts are simply there to make sure Rite Aid doesn't do anything sneaky with the money before paying off its creditors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was talking a out bailouts specifically yeah, so not in this case.

Chapter 11 is to protect against creditors and force them to cooperate, prevent lawsuits and seizing assets. IN EXCHANGE the court promises to make sure the creditors get their share in the end.

Guess how it always ends...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The airlines (and many other industries) have used it against organized labor.

[–] MagicShel 1 points 1 year ago

The question is whether it's better overall to have Rite-aid simply cease to be and have all their assets sold off to pay their financiers only part of what is owed. It's a fair question because if the investors don't lose money when this happens, they are motivated to push businesses to undertake riskier behaviors.

The other option is this bankruptcy/restructuring where the creditors/financiers don't get paid for a while to let the company get their shit together and eventually the company comes back out of bankruptcy and everything returns to normal. It's sort of like when student loan repayments or evictions were paused.

I'm firmly of the belief that any company that is "too big to fail" absolutely must be broken up as a matter of national economic security. But restructuring of debts to allow a company to continue to do business and to allow investors to recoup more of their investment isn't a new thing and is arguably overall good for people - if every single Rite-aid disappeared overnight, that would really disrupt a lot of peoples' lives.

Another thing to consider is that one of the reasons they are in financial trouble is that they got sued. Well if they just went under, then the folks who are supposed to be made whole by those lawsuits might collect nothing at all (I know it's complicated, but I don't know how the assets are legally divided up in a liquidation - I'm sure judgments are high priority).

So overall, while this is certainly questionable and debatable, in the grand scheme of things much, much worse stuff happens that needs to be fixed before we get around to worrying overmuch about this - in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It's just code for it's hard for them to pay their debts so they want to Welch on some of the ones they don't want to pay. (Like pesky lawsuits for fueling the opioid epidemic).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

TIL Rite Aid still exists

Walgreens attempted to buy Rite Aid for about $9.4 billion in a deal announced in 2015. But the larger drugstore chain scaled back its ambition a couple years later and bought only a chunk of Rite Aid, around 1,900 stores, to get the deal past antitrust regulators.