this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
605 points (95.8% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3809 readers
2 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 180 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’ve seen the original post a few times but never the follow up, thank you for including that.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago

Neither had I! I assumed it was a fake interaction that I was happy to take at face value because it’s entertaining - but it looks like it’s real. There’s one more screenshot of people offering him jobs in his DMs, but it’s not that interesting.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Same here. That follow up actually made this go from good entertainment to fucking amazing.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Far out. I've been in a Trainwreck Team as a contractor and I didn't bother answering to the BS the manager came up with, which ended in my contract not being renewed (thankfully).

I can't imagine how fed up this guy must have been to actually state "don't call me ever again".

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I remember reading the original of these without the tagline up top. The guys name was Abs Delfuego (I’m not making this up, you can google him). He posted by omegaweapon on Reddit. He had a neighbor with a disabled son, and Abs made an arcade machine for him.

His wife had died a couple years prior, and he started a business making arcade cabinets and occasionally maki no custom machines for charities. After he lost his wife he just kinda started not caring about being polite. If anybody got uppity with him, he’d cancel the contract. Just flat out, here’s your money, I’m done.

There were a lot of unhappy bosses calling gabs to apologize. Also a lot of people threatening to sue. I wonder what happened to him.

Edit: Apparently I can’t read, and this wasn’t Abs. I could swear I read something similar from Abs, but as the first line calls the person Caleb, I was mistaken.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember the arcades ! so that's the same guy ! what a madlad

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No it's not the same guy, this one is some dude named Caleb

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oof. You’re right. I can’t believe I missed that in the image lol. I did think that was one of his, as I vaguely remember something similar.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I know exactly who you're talking about. Real great guy did a lot for charities. Not a big deal. 🙂 He had a lot like that you work with entitled people a lot when you're on your own boss.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for helping me read

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

That's delightful!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I literally do not care about the content or if I agree with the message, I automatically downvote anything that unironically censors curse words.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m with you. It’s a huge bugbear for me and I’m not even sure why it annoys me so much! But this is a cross post, I only censored identify info in the second photo to comply with the rules.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I double checked the rules of this community and it doesn't say anything about having to censor identity info, that was a reddit rule that you had to censor Twitter handles, usernames, and such.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No posting of personal information was in the lemmy code of conduct when I created this community. Like all communities, this one has to follow those rules and the rules of the instance. It’s since been removed from the code of conduct I believe but, as others have commented, censoring the names of private individuals seems like the decent thing to do - especially as we’re sometimes laughing at the people in these screenshots. I’ll add it as a rule of its own in the sidebar for now.

Currently I’m the only contributor here and I’m happy to continue taking the few seconds to censor full names and social media handles in the screenshots I post. I also make the effort to post the context, any follow ups and news links when possible, so there isn’t any need to go to Reddit/Twitter or wherever it’s from.

However, I’m open to feedback on the rules and how this community is run, as stated in the stickied post. Would you like me to open a vote on whether we should keep the rule about censoring identifying info (or make your own post about it)? Or we could just go by the up/downvote ratio on your comment as an indication of what the majority want. Upvote to get rid of the rule, downvote to keep it. Currently 4 people vote to scrap the rule, 10 people want to keep it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I've been downvoted for saying facts just like I did with my previous comment here so I wouldn't read into it as this is what the community for sure wants. I checked the rules and it was not there so I commented that, it's not an opinion but people get triggered all the same because they are used to reddit's rules and assume lemmy is like reddit. But it is not, the different instances have their different rules and communities have rules on top of that. If you want to change the rules that's up to you. Generally a vote might be nice, one that everyone can see and it isn't hidden in this comment chain (the OP of this chain is already hidden by downvotes) and isn't determined by only 20 people. Personally, it's a waste of time because you can easily lookup the tweet and find the person. But if people want it to be this way because they think it "helps", I guess that's how it will be. But at least the community will have a voice even if it is something I feel is a waste. I feel more irritated by the constant censoring of "bad words" and don't care so much about the usernames, after all it can be easily looked up if you want. I wouldn't downvote a post over it like OP said but I can see where the frustration comes from, how corporations want to sanitize the internet. Anyway, thanks for listening to my rambling.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Seems like the decent thing to do though.