Xbox

5132 readers

1 users here now

An Xbox community for Lemmy!

UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE

Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe

Rules:

Stay on topic.
No hate speech.
No Politics.
No console wars. We are all gamers.
No Clickbait
Be a decent human.
No piracy talk or links to copywrited content.

QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:

New to Lemmy?

View the Getting Started Guide

Community Finder

Attributions:

Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg

Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

After Just One Week, Paradox Is Already Admitting Dissapointment With The Lamplighters League (www.purexbox.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"The commercial reception has been too weak"

Edit: Updated the title to be less click baity (hopefully)

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm just through the first mission (gamepass), so take this with a grain of salt, but it's...fine.

The setting is interesting, but the gameplay is like 100 other games, and this implementation is barely average in the genre.

The biggest reason I wouldn't buy it now, though, is Paradox itself. If it's like every single other Paradox title, it will be steeply discounted within a year to promote a bunch of DLC that finishes the game. I like plenty of their games, but I'd never buy one this early. Their reputation is too deeply ingrained in the minds of gamers at this point. They just need to go full F2P, since that's how almost all their games end up anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You have to split Paradox into two parts: game developer for their own games, and published for games developed elsewhere (externally, or through independently operating owned developers). Their DLC model works well for their in-house games, because they have total control AND people play those games for thousands and thousands of hours (the EU4 joke is that you finish the tutorial at 1444 hours). If you divide the cost of the game and all DLC by hours played, it's usually cheaper per hour, if not competitive, than most other games.

In this case, the game was developed by Harebrained Schemes, which is a studio Paradox bought five years ago with projects underway. There is absolutely no guarantee of 7+ years of continual updates and DLC. You might be stuck with the game as is, and it's a flop.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Paradox_Interactive_games

I'd note the recent exceptions to the rule, which may show they've changed tactics: Imperator:Rome was a flop that they never did fix and rescue, whereas CK3 felt super polished on launch.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like tactics games such as Gears Tactics and Steamworld Heist, but it sounded like the structure of this game was ultra-high-stakes consequences fail-forever setup like XCOM. I guess that appeals to a lot of people but not me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn’t look that good that’s why, only got Xbox games pass this week myself too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It looks like a sort of watered down Xcom from what I've seen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Releases a game that has major performance issues

Is shocked that people aren't just buying it anyways

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I got a laugh out of the whole article.