this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Almost anything regarding Singapore

468 readers
4 users here now

Singapore related posts (any deletion by moderators WILL come with explanation) Moderation will be stepped up as the community grows. Ask Singapore related questions at !asksingapore

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Was this a complete waste of time or what?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's good for this to have an airing, but can I just say that Singapore is privileged to have such a small-potatoes issue to be considered a political saga? Even by the standards of Singapore's own history, this is tame: LKY's condominium-purchasing scandal from the 90s was 100x worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There's first world issues, then there's Singapore level issues. Oh I didn't know about the Nassim Jade saga and did some digging

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1996/05/21/Singapore-leaders-defend-condo-buys/6903832651200/

"Calling himself a 'walking model,' Lee said he had also received discounts from his car dealer, tailor and shoe maker because of his status. 'That's the way business is done,' he said. 'Let's grow up."

"'The elder Lee, 72, argued his high profile was a legitimate incentive for his real estate agent to give him a discount."

Oh wow, OG Lee is quite something, wouldn't have stood in today's environment. I wonder if today's opposition considered bringing this up in the Ridout Road saga. What angle could have been played?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely poor optics for those involved.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Poor optics maybe but there is no reason why politicians should be denied opportunities available to non-politicians. It's also good that this is debated in parliament but to involve their family members is low.

load more comments
view more: next ›