this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4082 readers
157 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am definitely not pro-smoking but won't this just create a pretty substantial black market?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It will create a substantial black market, but it won't just do that. It will make it difficult to conveniently buy cigarettes, which will drastically cut down on the number of smokers.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that what they said about alcohol, marijuana, crack, and every other thing we've tried to outlaw over the years? The strategy doesn't ever seem to work and yet every time it's proposed we get about half of people saying, oh, well this time will be different.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's distinctly different in this case: they're just trying to prevent people who are turning smoking age from conveniently being able to buy cigarettes. They're not taking away cigarettes from people who can already buy them, which was not the case for prohibition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Presumably vaping will still be legal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's hope so! My main worry is it pushes things underground where you can't really track and regulate anything, which has happened in other prohibition policies.

I think I'd be more up for it if smoking use was trending in the wrong direction but it's been pretty consistently trending downwards since the 70s. But if it accelerates the decline then that would definitely be a positive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

it's harder to smuggle loads of cigarettes because of the size of each bundle.

perhaps people will smuggle in powdered nicotine and make vape juice for cheap.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It depends if it's a ban on just cigarettes or nicotine in general. Ban a drug, and you'll create a black market for it. Ban a method of administering a drug, and you can move it to other safer or more socially acceptable methods of application.

I personally hate smoking. However, as far as I am concerned, it's down to the individual, so long as they are not affecting me, and covering the excess social costs (via taxes).

Unfortunately, most/many of the cigarette smokers I encounter are of the inconsiderate type. A single smoker can cover a large area in smoke, and most don't either notice or care. I have yet to see a viable method of stopping this, other than banning cigarettes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Actually, any law is useless, because of criminals.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God damnit! I actually support this. Fuck.

It'll never happen, but there you go.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sure Kids from a certain social background will still be able to do it.

I'm talking about the kids in Sunaks class, that I'm sure will still be smoking Stogies and sipping Whisky together at Davos or Bohemian Grove when they're older.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Because prohibition always goes well.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I think this idea has merit, though I would stop short of extending the War On Drugs to criminalise possession or use of tobacco.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can’t decide wether I like this, on one hand smoking is obviously bad, but on the other I wouldn’t want to be unable to if I wanted to. I think it would be better to make sure the public are educated on the subject so that people can make informed decisions for themselves rather than an outright ban on sale.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

If it only affected the user, sure, but the reality of it is that the smoke contaminates everything around it.

I was in my 20's when I realised it's not normal to mop your walls every year, also made the connection that moving out reduced my migraines. I did not realise just how much I stank everywhere I went thanks to my mum's smoking, and coming back off holiday from smoke free relatives I felt my throat and eyes burn as I was settling back in at home.

My neighbours a few doors down sometimes smoke in the garden when the weather is nice, so I have to shut all my windows and retreat indoors if I want to keep breathing freely.

It's a lot better than it used to be, but it still restricts my comfort and quality of life if someone nearby decides they have the individual right to smoke.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think people are idiots and need to be protected from themselves in some circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Realistically though this sort of thing isn’t going to stop that, it will just push it underground leading to it being unregulated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could argue that about any law. The majority of people aren't going to start smoking if its not easily available to them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That assumes that this idea would actually work. I doubt that it will actually be challenging to get hold of cigarettes after this goes into place, there will almost certainly be a lot of shops that will still sell them to people who are under the minimum age. For it to work properly I think there would have to be a lot of money spent on enforcing it. Alternatively though, one could argue that even that is better than not having any measures put in place.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there anyone left who doesn't already know that smoking is bad for you? Prohibition is dumb and doesn't work but it seems there isn't much left to be done in the education department. I think it's time we just let people make their own decisions and shut up about it. There's plenty of other perfectly legal things that people fuck up their health with. I'm not sure why we talk so much about this particular thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mostly agree, but I would still appreciate more education, maybe more in areas like second hand smoke, so that smokers don’t impact everyone else with their decisions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

You can tell they're panicking because they're actually doing something that benefits people. I hope they ban disposable vapes too