this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
1003 points (97.4% liked)

solarpunk memes

2806 readers
456 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Call me a peasant any day cause overnight oats are delicious. Here’s my recipe you are now asking yourselves for: 1/4 cup steel cut oats, 1 Tbsp chia seeds, a glob of honey, 1/8 tsp salt, 1/4 tsp cinnamon, 3/4 cup of milk, then in the morning add 1/4 cup crushed walnuts and a ton of blueberries.

Now if you’ll excuse me, it’s gruel o’clock for this peasant.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

pro tip: try frozen berries and add them the night before to infuse the oats with berry juice. which is also practical because you can mix all together the night before in a to go jar and in the morning you don‘t waste any time and can get right to slaving away for our feudal overlords

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

And the quick and dirty recipe:

Maple and Brown Sugar Oats

  • Oats
  • Hot Water
  • Brown Sugar
  • Maple syrup
  • Pinch of Salt

Doing this to Farina also makes Malt O' Meal - Brown Sugar version

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, but this one is just oats with sugar while the one above actually has fruit and nuts for that healthy boost.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need a pinch of salt, trust me on this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah how could I forget!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I actually don't mind people who want to live in tiny homes. After all, it's our societal fixation on mcmansions and suburban sprawl for all that has caused us to pass restrictive zoning laws and parking minimums and setback requirements and everything, which have created an artificial scarcity of housing. And it's this artificial scarcity of housing that investors, speculators, landlords, and old homeowners use to extract ungodly amounts of wealth from the younger and working class. If we abolished those laws, built more housing, and solved the housing crisis, we wouldn't be feeling nearly so much like peasants, working paycheck to paycheck and under mountains of debt.

If there's no housing scarcity, your landlord can't extract nigh-unlimited amounts of money from you.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm a bit of a minimalist and dream of a well designed ~~tiny~~ small home. You can cram all of the bells and whistles of modern living in 800-1100 square feet easily and be comfortable while you're at it. It only gets tricky when kids come into the picture, id imagine. But I'm dreaming of a ~~tiny~~ small home so I don't think kids are a reasonable decision financially lol

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not really a tiny home, that's just a slightly smaller house. They have a tiny home show where I live, and the biggest ones are 350-ish sq ft. Most are under 200. I'd love to get really crazy and build one that's like 400sq ft - when they're really well designed, that feels massive, but it's still small enough to clean in like, an hour.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Yeah 1000/1100 is in the "small but normal" territory. 800/900 is fairly small if your household has more than one person though. But well designed I could see 400-500 being pretty cozy. Tbh, with 800 sq ft I'd have like 300 living and sleeping space and the rest for my kitchen and bathroom lol. I don't have a dream house, I have a dream shower and kitchen

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I currently live in a 550 sq ft 1-br apartment, and it's actually quite comfortable. Adequately sized kitchen wirh a kitchen island (since I like to cook), bedroom big enough for a queen bed, a not-cramped bathroom, and a living room. Plus pretty decent closet space and in-unit laundry. Tbh, my only wish is that the living room were a bit bigger so I could have a proper sofa and a proper desk for days I work from home. Currently just rocking a desk and an armchair and a TV stand. For a family, I'd definitely want closer to 1000 sq ft.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have a family of four in a 1000sq ft house and it's honestly perfect. Any bigger would be too much work for me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ours is basically around 420sqft. It started as a 12x30 amish shed that we insulated and put in power/woodstove/12v water pump(from the creek). But then I added a 10x12 bath and washing room.

It is pretty comfy for two people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i don't want a tiny home, i want to live in a god damn cooperatively owned commune.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

If everyone is there because of some shared interest in the project then sure, it might work. But if you ever lived in a building owned by the very people that live there, like it happens all the time in Europe, you know people often act very much against the shared interest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I started with my tiny home. And hope to gather some like-minded folks to turn it into a commune once I have basic infra to support more than just myself and my wife.

We are getting there! Maybe next year we will be able to invite one more family/couple/group.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I would actually love that. They're building something that's sort of in that vein where I live, where each family/individual has their own house of sorts, but there's a big communal building with a giant kitchen and dining space, library, living room, gardens, etc, instead of trying to pack all of that in each house. Everyone has to commit to contributing somehow, whether it's lawn maintenance or helping cook communal meals or whatever. Unfortunately, it would make my commute about an hour, so that's a no go, but it sounds nice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd quite happily live in a tiny home as long as it's surrounded by a couple of acres.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basically true, but consider the alternative. Given how expensive things are now, if you don't live a very minimal lifestyle you are going to be much more trapped in your career than someone who does. You won't be able to retire early, you won't be able to switch to something lower paid but more enjoyable/laid back, you won't have the means to take some time off to pursue your own business ideas or just dealing with life stuff.

If you're dead set on living the "American Dream" or something and refuse to hold back on treating yourself with luxuries, you are going to end up being even more of a tool of your technofeudalist masters. Acknowledging that doesn't mean turning a blind eye to what is happening, it's just basic self preservation of your freedom.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The problem is that more and more the tiny house and so forth is no longer a choice, but a neccessity to survive. In places like Silicon Valley a normal job basicly forces you to either communte for hours every day or live in a tiny house just to survive. Looking at the rent increases and high home prices combined with high intrest rates, the cost of housing looks like it will grow in the coming years. That is not just a US problem, but the case in many parts of the developed world. In poorer countries it is a reality for even longer and for even more people.

That being said, if you have the choice, building up some wealth is certainly a good idea. With a bit of it and some good ideas, it becomes much easier to drop out a bit out of the capitalist hellscape and avoid the worst problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The thing is, the need for large expansive homes have substantially evaporated in younger generations as technology advances.

The desire for a massive home as a well off (not wealthy, but above peasant) person was due to:

  1. Needing somewhere to store all your necessary shit, your tools of your trade, etc etc.

  2. Needing somewhere for your servant(s) to live, because they took care of the house for you

  3. Somewhere to store all your books and other pleasantries

However, our servants are now tiny little robots that dont need to eat or sleep, they dont need an entire bedroom and seat at the table.

The entire knowledge of all of humanity no longer requires a library of alexandria, but instead can fit in your pocket.

Many folks have all the tools of their trade able to fit in a small laptop bag at most.

When you can largely fit all your requirements of modern life in a single cardboard box, as opposed to needing several rooms, the desire for a mansion dwindles. Entire kitchens have been replaced with a single microwave and a hotplate.

Meals that used to take an entire day and a whole kitchen staff to prepare, now take a single person hitting an on button.

We have VR, laptops, netflix, the entire internet, etc etc all at our fingertips.

And most importantly, we have cars and whatnot. A trip to the store is no longer a "wake up at 6 in the morning to get the horses saddled and hitched, then three hour ride into town, get back home just before sunset" affair.

It's now "hop in the car and drive over to the store in 10 minutes"

And unlike horses, a car doesnt need a whole ass stable and stablehand. It can just... sit there lol

So yeah, its perfectly reasonable for us to slowly revert back to small life, everything we could possibly need to live life can fit in an extremely small square footage now, theres literally no need to have a giant mansion, it's largely pointless.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In most towns and cities, grocery store should be within walkable distance to allow people to get what they need for the next day or two, removing the necessity for large pantries or food storage rooms. Also getting benefits of eating healthier and fresher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is this astroturfing?

Of course I want more space! small rooms with a small number of rooms is claustrophobic and cluttered. I need space for me and all my shit!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just do make sure that, if you live in a small home, you spend some time out in the town, because living in too little space can harm your feels.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wish houses weren't required by law to have a lawn. I could save so much space if I didn't have one and all the junk to take care of it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This thread blows my mind.

You'd prefer to just be boxed in with people all around you and concrete everywhere? That's what developers would do if they weren't required by law to give you space. Pack them into smaller spaces and get more money!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You could look into lawn alternatives. Here the rules are no weeds and vegetation can't be over 6 inches unless it is intentionally cultivated. So I have native plants in garden beds around my house that take up roughly 50% of the yard, and the "lawn" portion is mostly native groundcovers that are unlikely to reach above 6 inches. I rarely have to do anything to it since it's mostly native. We go out there maybe once a month to mow the little grass that's left (which we're phasing out as natives spread) and pull weeds.

It was a little more work up front to make beds and plant natives, but we did it the lazy way, starting out small and expanding over the years as natives grew and spread. We did temporary borders of cardboard with rocks on top to smother grass and expand out as needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you call it “oat milk”, you can sell gruel at a steep markup.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Isn't dairy subsidized to make it so cheap?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Serfs had The Commons. We don’t even have that

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism is just an extension of feudalism already. There was no transition

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I won't stand for slandering overnight oats like that!

edit: how tf did I mess up my comment so badly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

overnight oats are delicious

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Technofeudalism is just endgame capitalism

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

But I like tiny homes...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

There's no point renaming capitalism

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think this is very toxic post. I live in apartment in a size of tiny house, and I have no wish to move to suburbs and slave away my life in traffic jams. People should live in a way that they enjoy. Comparing is just a dick measuring contest. And One should be able to enjoy his mega mansion and his huge truck if he wants to too, providing it is done in environmentally safe way and all the taxes (and I mean appropriately and proportionally calculated taxes) are paid

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's hard to take this seriously when you shit on living in the suburbs then immediately say "people should live in a way they enjoy".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Respectfully - I don’t see how mega-mansions and huge-trucks could be considered ‘environmentally safe’.

And people should also consider the “social-impact of earning”…

since most mansion-owners “leeched” their money via white-collar jobs at exploitative corporations.

…In my opinion - the entire downstream effect of our choices must be considered.

(I write this in the spirit of unified awareness - I know you aren’t pushing for mansions or trucks)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My smallish place gives me a 10 to 15 minute commute. Which I take do by bicycle frequently. My friends in the suburbs travel 1.5 hours each way. Fuck that shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›