this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
320 points (79.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26305 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure why this got removed from 196lemmy..blahaj.zone but it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong. Like an automatic DM or something

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I like Matt Dillyhuntys approach to objective morality: he picks a subjective and kind of arbitrary foundation like wellbeing and objectively measures all actions against this foundation.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An Aztec would not agree to any of that. They took slaves, they didn't allow women to vote because they didn't allow voting and women were second-class and they weren't interested in a fair and equitable society, which is part of the reason their enemies helped the Spanish take them down.

So I'd say that your 'objective truths' didn't apply to a major human civilization.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Here is an adjacent argument to the one you gave:

  1. Some people think the election was fixed
  2. Some people think the election was fair

Therefore, there is no "objective truth" to whether the election was fair or fixed.

Moral of the story, disagreement alone does not entail a lack of objective truth. But the post was not about moral disagreement, it was about moral progress.

Moral relativists have a hard time explaining why we should have moral progress. The moral relativist will argue that any action whatsoever will be a good action if there is a certain group consensus. So why should we fight for a more fair and equitable society if the society we have now is *exactly * as morally good as any other system we could enact? Even worse, if the majority of people in your situation believe that something unjust is the right thing to do, then protesting against them is morally wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does that have to do with my argument about the Aztecs? I don't see the connection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because you seem to misunderstand what objective means, the other user is attempting to help you understand that with an unrelated example.

Objective means something is true. It does not mean consensus.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Yes, I know what objective means. What makes their morals untrue and yours true?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the next step. Once we agree that someone is right and someone is wrong, then we can start talking about the definition of "moral good". And that is a very difficult and complicated discussion. But just because it's hard to define doesn't necessarily mean it's not real.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong.

I once got comments removed and community banned and found some explanations on the mod log on the bottom of the website of the instance

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›