this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4138 readers
74 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems to be the next level of culture wars. They have no interest in researching why there is an increase in shoplifting occurrences.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Theres like a bazillion movies, books and games telling us why overarching surveillance is a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

There's plenty of real life examples of why overarching surveillance is a bad thing. The Stasi, the Gestapo, the Chinese social credit system, the myriad of Western domestic spying programs revealed by whistleblowers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Oh, don't worry, it's only bad for the common people so that doesn't count.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They think the people who are shoplifting have passports?

The people who are shoplifting (in the main part) are desperate people who are really at rock bottom. The money being spent on this could be used in much better ways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“By enabling the police to use private dashcam footage, as well as the immigration and asylum system, and passport database, the government are turning our neighbours, loved ones, and public service officials into border guards and watchmen.

That starts with supporting people who are struggling to survive amid a cost of living crisis, an inadequate welfare system and rocketing food prices.”

Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch, said: “Philp’s plan to subvert Brits’ passport photos into a giant police database is Orwellian and a gross violation of British privacy principles.

It means that over 45 million of us with passports who gave our images for travel purposes will, without any kind of consent or the ability to object, be part of secret police lineups.

“To scan the population’s photos with highly inaccurate facial recognition technology and treat us like suspects is an outrageous assault on our privacy that totally overlooks the real reasons for shoplifting.

Officers will be able to compare those facial images against CCTV, dashcam and doorbell technology to help find a match for criminals as prosecution rates are at record lows.


The original article contains 818 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!