this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

AI Generated Images

7157 readers
357 users here now

Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.

No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.

This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.

Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.

No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.

AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.

To embed images type:

“![](put image url in here)”

Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.


Community Challenge Past Entries

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Prompt: Futuristic male soldier with rifle on back, heavy military armor with panels and tubing, halo infinite, cyberpunk, standing on a street in a futuristic urban warzone on fire, photorealistic, depth of field, cinematic color grading, iso400
 Negative prompt: Anime, cartoon, child, drawing
 Steps: 50, Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 274612244, Face restoration: CodeFormer, Size: 912x512, Model hash: 661697d235, Model: cyberrealistic_v30, Denoising strength: 0.7, Hires upscale: 2, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscaler: R-ESRGAN 4x+, Version: v1.3.2

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Always find it interesting how the prompts read as an “outsider”. Do you know, or could you guess why did it not observe the second part “with rifle on back”?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Prompt terms are weighted, so I could have increased the weighting of "with rifle on back" to encourage the model to prioritize that portion of the prompt - this image was generated in a batch of 6, it was split 50/50 between outputs that included it and outputs that didn't.