TODAY'S 🎙SHOW: Douglas Tuman interviews Nima Bagheri, a cybersecurity expert who has investigated on who Satoshi Nakamoto is and claims , with nearly 100% certainty, that it is Adam Back.

The two discuss how Nima came to this conclusion and why he thinks it matters that the Satoshi Nakamoto mystery is solved. Nima also talks about how no cryptocurrency currently on the market is totally untraceable and that with his skills he could create one but why he doesn't want to.

They then talk about the current capabilities of Chainalysis to track Monero and if it’s possible that the government is hiding their capabilities to track people for the time being, the current state of America and much more!

Watch Here (YouTube) ➡️ https://youtu.be/BFrQjbKsihc

Watch Here (Odysee) ➡️ https://odysee.com/@MoneroTalk:8/what-it-means-for-bitcoin-if-we-know:e

Listen Here 🎧: https://www.monerotalk.live/what-it-means-for-bitcoin-if-we-know-adam-back-is-satoshi-w-nima-bagheri

Do you love coffee and Monero as much as we do? Pay with Monero for fresh beans & tip the farmers if you enjoy it! Go to Gratuitas.org today!

Watch Monerotopia23 confer videos here: monerotopia.com/videos

Special thanks to our sponsors, u/cakelabs and u/Stealthex_io as well as u/sunchakr for making these interviews possible! And of course our listeners and supporters for making Monero Talk possible!

Listen to all the podcasts 🎧 here: iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/monero-talk/id1445930212 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/60lQ05X8lcuXv71fhi6hl7?si=SL2rlvDPS0q68169NlCrtQ

If you enjoy our show please Subscribe, Like, Share, Rate our YouTube Channel & Podcasts. This will help us grow and spread Monero content!

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Totally unrealistic unless Satoshi is trying their hardest not to be recognized. Which makes it not so unrealistic, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@monerotalk this episode was quite a mess. Really wasted my time here trying to make up what the guest's claims really are. Doug was utterly unable to set the guest straight, and was unable to make him present some coherent train-of-thought arguments supporting his claims. The whole episode was a stream-of-consciousness style rambling coming from a seem-to-be deranged mind.

I expected better.