this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Blue Team

529 readers
3 users here now

Blue Teamers are the first (and sometimes last) line of defense in the ongoing cyber war. This place is to chat out detection strategies, complain about SIEMs, compare SOAR playbooks, or post mean memes about the Red Team.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: Is ISO27001 easy or am I just too dumb to see the complexity?

Hi!

Just wanted to start some conversation on a standard that's sorta kinda infamous where I'm currently at, the ISO27001 standard.

I got tasked with "polishing up an ISMS" for a company and while I can't go into details, I got basically a control name (from 27002:2022) and a description of "what we need it to do." Now that I got into it, I feel that I may be missing something. Most of their controls are "Limit access to server room" or "Make sure access is logged and not permanent."

Like, the standard is not difficult reading, but if they can explain to ME how the controls should look in the end, what am I missing? Is there some extremely difficult part? Or can I just say "Just make the creds timeout after a month. Source: dude trust me?"

If you were tasked with implementing ISO27001, did you encounter any specific hurdles that I may not see from where I'm standing? The only thing I can see after I got through all the controls was a feeling that this will be more expensive on time for the security teams.

Thank you for coming to my TED(x) talk.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The controls themselves are not hard to understand. Writing policies describing these controls is also not that hard. But: changing the way an organization is working, in terms of habits, documentation, information management, how we collaborate - that can be really, really hard. So even if the requirements in ISO 27001 and the controls guidance in ISO 27002 look straight forward from a technical point of view, it is not easy to change the way of working for a whole organization! It requires leadership, it requires resources, and enough competent people with internal social capital to help support and drive the change. This is why an ISO 27001 journey is usually not just smooth sailing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No specific hurdles, other than to keep applying attention to detail and using the ample guidance in the ISO PDFs.

From what I can see, especially after the 2022 update, there's no hidden magic or complexity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

TL;DR: Yes, ISO 2700{1,2} are a low barrier of entry but a common set of controls that should be able to be applied anywhere.

The biggest hurdle to deploying any framework is updating the cycle of controls and keeping them aligned both with management and with the parties implementing them. There is as much non-infosec work as there is actual implementation of the controls.

  • Policy Statement: Management guideline / statement to be followed
  • Process: The flow to follow in order to meet that policy statement
  • Procedure: The steps to follow in order to enable the process
  • Standard: The measurement of the compliance with the policy statement

Each one of the (Annex A) 14 domains has specific controls within the ISMS (27001) that each need the above implementation steps in a big ol' spreadsheet. Then the technical controls within ISO 27002 need to be applied, documented, and supporting evidence gathered as well.

For implementing ISO 27002 I'd highly recommend looking at Common Criteria or the CIS controls that map 27002 to CIS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Looks good! I'll check it out!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yea ISO27000 stuff is basic but its still a long list to all check off. I was also initially suprised how high level it all is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Personally, the toughest thing for me was justifying changes to the organisation and making sure any suggested changes are realistic for the maturity you're dealing with. This may mean some recommendations aren't best practice, but you can start moving the organisation in that direction, or even lay out a roadmap to make big changes more manageable and gradual.

As much as I would love to make hard and fast changes, this just isn't feasible in most organisations (especially government).

load more comments
view more: next ›