this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
180 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18966 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 15,000 people in Arizona have registered to join a new political party floating a possible bipartisan “unity ticket” against Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While that’s less than the population of each of the state’s 40 largest cities, it’s still a number big enough to tip the presidential election in a critical swing state. And that is alarming people trying to stop Trump from winning the White House again.

The very existence of the No Labels group is fanning Democratic anxiety about Trump’s chances against an incumbent president facing questions about his age and record. While it hasn’t committed to running candidates for president and vice president, No Labels has already secured ballot access in Arizona and 10 other states. Its organizers say they are on track to reach 20 states by the end of this year and all 50 states by Election Day.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Ah, I remember when I thought voting third party would matter. Hey kids. Take it from someone who voted for Johnson in 2016. I get that voting strategically fucking sucks, and you want to make your voice heard, but it is not worth getting Donald Trump elected just to be part of the 3% that said "I don't like either of these people." With any luck, third parties won't give the presidency to republicans next year, and one or two supreme court justices will die or retire in the next five years, allowing us to start repairing our rights. Because justices nominated by Biden will suck, but justices nominated by Trump (or God forbid, Desantis) will suck in the same ways and much, much worse.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Yes, exactly. Both of these things can be true at the same time:

  1. First-past-the-post plurality voting is a crappy system, devised before humanity discovered the math of voting systems. It has all kinds of predictably terrible results.
  2. It is currently the system we have. Because of this, if people who object to fascism fail to vote for a non-fascist candidate who can win, then the fascists will win.

Anyone who disregards point 2 because of point 1 thereby ends up materially supporting fascism. This is unfortunate but that doesn't make it false.

"But I want to vote my principles!" Great! Is one of your principles "fascists should lose"? If so, then please make sure to take the steps that support that principle!

Currently in the US there are two parties that can credibly take the presidential election: the center-right party and the fascist party. This is unfortunate but that doesn't make it false.

Vote third party in local elections. Elect a Socialist mayor or a Libertarian judge; a Green sheriff or a Communist dogcatcher. Build those local party networks. Support approval voting or other voting systems that actually make some mathematical sense. But please don't let the fascists win because you're pissed off at the voting system.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One thing I liked about living in a safely blue state is I could vote for whoever I wanted without risking the destruction of the planet.

But Fetterman's my senator so I guess that's cool

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think so I'd consider PA safely blue. Fetterman is cool though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was exactly their point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah they were talking about another state for the first section.its scary how red PA is outside of the 3 largest cities though lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm sure third party voters aren't turned off at all by people condescending them and calling them children.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I didn't mean to call all third party voters kids, I was addressing people for whom '24 will be their first election. If it's not your first election and you still haven't figured out that third parties are a trap, I'm not even gonna try to convince you otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Take it from someone who voted for Johnson in 2016

You mean a Republican who smokes weed? 🙄 If the libertarian party was your first choice, the GOP were your second, so by your own binary logic, that was a vote taken from Trump, not Hillary.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nah, by the time November rolled around my choices were Johnson>Clinton>Trump

I was 18, not exactly the most politically intelligent kid

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For everyone arguing about the validity of voting for a third party: contact your representatives and push them to support ranked choice voting initiatives. Maine and Alaska already have some form of RCV. RCV in the US

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They won't, of course, because then they couldn't scare you with threats that the wrong lizard will get elected.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If a third party is enough to spoil your election, you should probably run a better candidate instead of complaining about it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The third party here is a spoiler to try to bleed people from the left to think there's a legitimate other option when their motive is to get a Republican elected. People on the left may not be equally susceptible to bad faith arguments, but that doesn't mean they're immune.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

So fund the libertarian party then. I'm sick of wimpy ass Democrats whining about how unfair everything is instead of actually fighting back.

You are not going to win over third party voters, so stop trying. Invest in spoiler candidates and spend most of the party's money on GOTV instead of blowing it on ads for the presidential candidate. It's honestly shocking how incompetent the Democrats are compared to the GOP, who pay for their voters to throw literal GOTV parties with neighborhoods full of GOTV organizers and canvassers. There's a reason they keep elections close despite being a minority.

Meanwhile Dems will just fucking blame voters if they lose again.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The spoiler effect has been mathematically proven to be one of the defects of first-past-the-post elections by game theorists for quite some time. It doesn't really have anything to do with the candidates.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It is the job of elected officials to write and change laws. As this is a known issue of first past the post, democrats had every opportunity to push for amending elections to not use first past the post.

Its not right to complain about spoilers in elections when you have the power to do something about it, but chose not to.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

No Labels? Isn't that Andrew Yang's deal?

In Arizona, 15,000 people is enough to swing an election.

In 2020 the final count was:

Biden - 1,672,143
Trump - 1,661,686

10,457 vote difference... but that belies the bigger picture:

Jo Jorgensen (Libertarian) - 1.5% - 51,465
Howie Hawkins (Write-in) - 0.0% - 1,557
Jade Simmons (Write-in) - 0.0% - 236
Gloria La Riva (Write-in) - 0.0% - 190
Daniel Clyde Cummings (Write-in) - 0.0% - 36
President Boddie (Unaffiliated) - 0.0% - 13

I think it's less likely that a 3rd party would draw from Biden or Trump and more likely they'd draw from the other fringe candidates, esp. the Libertarians.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really wish the Democratic establishment would start treating centrist "Democrats", who actually do get Republicans elected, as antagonistically as they do progressives. The people who jump in with "both sides" when one side is getting massively worse aren't committed to centrism, they're laundering conservatism and/or trying to blunt the damage from their party's extremism. No Labels has been a transparent Republican op from the start.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Considering the policies of No Labels are just libertarian finance with even more billionaire backing, we really have to consider the likelihood that the idiots who might fall for it really are gonna be the "centrists" Dems have been courting for decades.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the Democrats are worried maybe run a candidate that isn't 100 and make changes that matter. If both parties are right of center there's gonna have to be a new one that's left

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, we need an actual left, but No Labels isn’t it. They preach centrism. But from what I’ve seen they’re just a way for right wingers to try to hide the fact that they’re right wingers.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, when one side is saying, "fuck peaceful group X, they don't deserve to live." and the other, "hey, maybe don't hate on people you don't even fucking know?" only a fucking moron thinks there's an acceptable middle ground.

Centrism is the ideology of the ignorant, gullible, and stupid. Nothing more.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, with people like Lieberman and Manchin signing up for this nonsense, it's not the hope for a better party. It's an attempt to poach off from the rightest most extent of the Democratic coalition, while parties like the Green Party poach from the left-most extent. At least the Libertarians are poaching off 'decent Republicans' on the other side, but we've got to be smarter than the Republicans here and NOT split our coalition in a voting system that gives the nod to the party with the largest unified coalition.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Agree. However, if we get to the general and it's far right or democrat, I hope people choose the ancient democrat to the more fascism-friendly alternative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a Biden problem. Dems need to decide if they really want to keep Republicans out or try to make sure their side wins. If it's to keep Republicans out they need to all vote 3rd party because most of us won't support your milquetoast conservatives again.

If it's to make sure their party wins, they are gonna lose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


PHOENIX (AP) — More than 15,000 people in Arizona have registered to join a new political party floating a possible bipartisan “unity ticket” against Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

The very existence of the No Labels group is fanning Democratic anxiety about Trump’s chances against an incumbent president facing questions about his age and record.

Fontes has not commented publicly but is expected to announce a decision in the coming weeks after telling No Labels he may take action against the group for failing to register under the state’s campaign finance law.

“It’s kind of like a performance art piece,” said Richard Grayson, who promptly after switching to No Labels endorsed Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

But supporters of No Labels insist that the political climate is far different heading into 2024, with wide swaths of voters in both parties exhausted by years of turmoil and chaos in Washington.

About half of registrants in August were formerly independent and another quarter were newly registered, according to Sam Almy, a Democratic data analyst based in Phoenix.


The original article contains 1,119 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›