Canada

My boomer parents be like:

• We had the oil crisis in the late seventies
• We had a recession in the 80's
• We had high inflation rates in the 80's
• We had high interest rates in the 80's
• Salaries were frozen for a year to combat inflation in the 80's
• We had it worse

They could afford a house and a car with two kids, gas, cable, phone and buy groceries virtually on a single income.

Meanwhile we have:

• A pollution crisis fueled by oil and plastics
• We've been in recession since 2008 (or so it feels like it)
• We're facing runaway inflation rates fueled by corporate greed instead of regular economic factors
• Interest rates are low, but property prices start at just under half a million in comparable areas, also interest in bank accounts give nothing and our savings lose value
• We have widespread wage stagnation since the early 2000's
• The world is ending

We can barely afford a small 500sq ft condo with double professional income, without a car or even kids in the mix, and we cry every time we buy groceries. And the whole world is burning. But sure, they had it worse.

I don't care if gas prices increase due to new regulations. It had to happen eventually. Maybe the day nobody will be able to drive to work will be the day they start investing in mass public transit.

It's a good move. Canada isn't even close to hitting it's climate goals. The only way to actually hit 1.5C climate goals would be to tax carbon extremely heavily, resulting in a massive drop in quality of life. However if we and other countries don't pay that "tax", then we will pay massive interest over the next couple generations. It's a lose lose situation.

Historically, fuel regulations have been wildly effective at controlling and reducing vehicle emissions. Improving and tightening those standards is another good step forward for our climate and air quality.

Something left out of every discussion on fuel price is consumer choice to purchase large, fuel inefficient vehicles. And no, "best in class" fuel efficiency doesn't mean shit if you are riding a vehicle several "classes" above what you actually need.

It's like the third rail, can't talk about it, even suggesting someone didn't actually need an F150 to commute to work is a cardinal sin. Of course, of course, you need that truck because you bought a seado, which you 100% also needed. Your a bad driver, so.you had to protect yourself in a mobile fortress, makes sense. What do you mean you know the difference between a want and need? A luxury and a nessecity?

Look at any list of top selling vehicles. Trucks , SUV and crossovers dominate the top of the lists. Even when hatchbacks or smaller vehicles are on the list they're often "sporty" models that themselves are not efficient.

The single biggest thing most people could have done to help dodge higher fuel prices is to have chosen a more efficient vehicle. Full stop.

The very last thing we should be considering is whinging about increasing fuel costs before looking at our own choices first. But I can feel it, I can feel someone out there getting all fired up at me about how I don't know their life, how they need that Land Rover because the kids have hockey, as if we couldn't get to hockey in the Toyota Terecel days.

$0.17/l....sure. drive less if you don't want to pay it. That's the entire point, using price pressure to reduce the usage of climate damaging fuels.

Increased fuel costs are gonna disproportionately hurt the poor. The great thing about the carbon tax is that the rebate scales with income. This doesn't.

This kind of policy feeds right-wing rhetoric that "elites" are using climate change to hurt the little guy.

I'm not sure if this is the right move... It'll inevitably hurt the consumer due to rising costs from the biofuel.

The government should target the polluting larger fish and you know, actually adhere to their climate goals... cough cough

"Canada has never reached any of its own climate targets," said Caroline Brouillette, national policy manager at Climate Action Network Canada, a coalition of more than 130 groups. Source