aa
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
7814 readers
33 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You should try Nala it is just an extension over Apt so 90% of same commands works but it adds things like parallel download, history and way nicer user interface. If a command doesn't work on Nala you can still use Apt since they are compatible
aa
That's the kind of stuff I was looking for to move to Debian. Thanks a lot!
Same! I don't want to use Snap!
flatpak is nice, .... just not sure if you would just call it a package manager ... but i guess for most people that description is close enough.
aa
Nix, it's one of the few featuring reproducible builds.
Yay for Linux because it feels like the easiest way to upgrade, search and install. Scoop for windows because it is sane, only user level permission, and is surprisingly up to date with a large catalog. Also easy to add new entries.
APK, the alpine linux package manager. It is very fast, faster than pacman and it blows apt and dnf out of the water and APKBUILDS are not too hard to write.
pacman. I have most experience with it and it just seems easier than apt once one learns the commands. less to write overall.
whatever is the standard on whichever distro I'm using
Definitely Nix, with flakes. Running on NixOS and Darwin. Also flatpak,appimage-run,docker when I’m too lazy to package, or when I simply don’t know how to (e.g. electron apps,dotnet)
I like pacman/yay enough to the point that I'm hesitant to use any distro that isn't arch-based...
I was reinstalling Linux on my laptop a few days ago and was thinking about going for Fedora, but leaving the AUR behind felt like too big a trade off lmao I'm lazy as hell
So here I am with yet another install of Endeavour. I always go back to it.
Currently I think that deb + flatpak is best combo. However with immutable systems become more mainstream that might change. However I do believe that flatpak will continue.
Apt and pacman. I prefer pacman but apt is just ingrained in my synapses and, like vi, I just use it without thinking most of the time.
Pacman it's fast at least faster than dnf and apt
Docker. It's a bit incomplete (regarding available packages) but you can do some really effective stuff like making your command run as nobody or even turning off the internet completely, but just for that co---
---...ooooh. OOOOOH. Package manager. Please forgive my ignorance. Um...paru takes the crown for me, and nala if for some reason someone is pointing a gun towards my bun forcing me to use Ubloatu.
yay. because AUR rules. I also really like appimages.
view more: next ›