61
Linux distro Nobara 42 ships with Brave by default and shifts to rolling release model
(nobaraproject.org)
Ew
this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
61 points (90.7% liked)
Linux
54531 readers
831 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
can't we make them publicly account for their decision to choose an anti LGBTQ+ browser?
Rather more of a crpyto bro shit browser with lack of privacy implementations and bad history. No different than Apple saying they love Privacy
they disabled that by configuration and they still thought it was the best browser, odd
Elaborate?
you have to look a long way back in time to find out, oddly enough as if you had a vendetta against a certain person
Why are you talking in riddles
do you like Brave browser?
Never used it, but given my aversion to crypto, no.
First I hear about them, and since Brave is the default browser I know I don't want to know more. Smooth!
Gross.
well, at least they provided some rationale for switching browsers. still, it's good thing we have bazzite.
Stares in Debian Testing/Sid.
Damn, not sure I'm a fan of any of this. I left Arch because I didn't want to be on Rolling release any more, and really liked what Nobara was offering for the out of the box experience.
Brave is super sketchy, and not sure about putting in yet another thing to handle updates (replacing plasma-discover and gnome-software).
I'm wondering if its worth forking it to remove some of these changes.
At least they disable the monetization features of Brave but making stupid Google Meet such a hard requirement to compromise of all ethics? WTF?
Brave? Yeah...nope
Don't know about brave, but rolling release is much better
The rolling release thing isn't for me, but I get why that model might appeal. Brave, though? Why?
Does the rolling release model mean Nobara is based on Fedora Rawhide now?
Edit: I found the answer from the developer on Reddit.
the VERSION updates are rolling. (N41->N42->N43+)
nothing is changing in the update process. we still do a monthly snapshot of fedora and provide that to users. we are -not- using rawhide.
the "rolling" simply means when its time to go 42->43 you'll receive those updates as standard package updates without needing to do any specific commands/changes.
The partial unannounced update broke my installation, which is why I finally ditched Nobara for Bluefin
I'll definitely uninstall brave but it makes sense why they chose it. People crying over it are being dumb. Hopefully when Firefox fixes its crashing issue it can go back to the default.
Rolling release? Not expecting this lol noice with brave by default