The actual city of London is tiny. It is very small part of of what is considered London
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
The same can be said for Paris, but it's still a remarkable result
It’s not the same. The City of London is an official district, it’s about 1 square mile, it’s not like the whole of zone 1 - central london - it’s not like we’re talking about London vs Greater London. It’s still great to see, and it’s likely the growth applies to much of central london, and hopefully also the majority mode share.
makes it even more infuriating that the second and third and fourth most use is cars....
while public transport is 3rd last .. horrible
I think it's vehicle count not passenger count.
Many buses in CoL will carry 50+ people at peak times so probably move more people than cars or bikes.
But walking was the most common by a fair bit, just not in that graph.
damn youre right I completely didnt see that. goes to show how manipulative data can be if yore not triple checking every angle for misconception (altough this isnt that bad, just surprising to me I didnt even consider such different parameter)
Is the tube not convenient?
wheres the tube listed under? but yea didnt think about that option not being listed here
It's very convenient, when it's not on fire.
Why on earth is there no bar for subways or trains in general in the graph? Surely that's also a significant percentage, and would probably shrink the car percentage quite a bit. Cause if that portion of people "moving around" isn't even counted, that seems like more than just a slight oversight...
Subways and trains aren't traffic. The study was specifically looking at traffic and how they should adjust the roads
Look up figure 5 and you'll see how people really get around in The City of London. They walk from station to office.
That's so cool! But they probably still only get a fraction of the space cars get.
And it still takes an hour and a quarter to go the 14 miles from Heathrow to downtown via car. 40 minutes by tube if you time it right.