this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
203 points (94.7% liked)

General Discussion

11946 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse and Feddit Lemmy Community Browser!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ok, imagine this, you are on reddit (say, a slow hobby focused subreddit), everybody there is nice and knowledgeable, and one day, the mods there announced that since there is not enough "content" on the sub, they are going to use a bot to repost content from 9gag in order to "bolster engagement" and "grow the community".

How would you feel about that?

If you feel upset and grossed out, you're exactly right.

I don't think there is a single non-spam subreddit where that kind of behavior would be tolerated without being called out for blatant mod abuse. No community in the world would ever tolerate automated reposting from another website, not reddit, not 4chan, not any forums of any size, even 9gag, I repeat, BLOODY 9GAG, was tired of being called out for reddit reposting and started making original content.

So why exactly should this kind of behavior be tolerated here?

Now, I'm sure some mods here did it with good intentions, but again, the road to the hell that is modern reddit is PAVED with good intentions. Content for the sake of content is bad, and we already knew it is bad, which is why Gallowboob was so thoroughly disliked, he generates """"""content"""""", in other words, spam that drowns out the normal people who can't compete with a professional marketer, much less a bot, which is exactly the reason why "Just block the bots" doesn't work, because it ruins the genuine engagements on a forum by drawing people to the lowest common denominator of """""""""""content""""""""""""".

Reddit, over the years, has turned into a platform for "bolstering engagement" for advertisers, and it does that by algorithmically stoking conflicts between people so they would endlessly argue and doomscroll. Why would we want that here? Now, I think most of us like the Lemmy/kbin right now because of the lack of bots here, and the conversations happen naturally and genuinely. I've even seen people here try to engage the bots, not realizing that they would never get a response out of them, because it felt normal to just talk about things.

(Eat your robot hearts out, @L4s and @BotIt)

Suppose then, if this repost bot situation was indeed temporary, why would people want to make original content if they are just going to be drowned out by bots? What's to stop someone from turning on bots from /r/dankmemes or /r/tiktokcringe? The bots are not members of the community, because they are not people (save the /r/botsright joke for more appropriate times), and over time, we will just become dependent on the bots hosing us down directly from that burning dumpster fire and become doomscrolling addicts again.

That's the number two lesson from the failure of Voat: that repost bots, like hate, should also not be tolerated, and Reddit will never die if we keep feeding it.

Everybody here are still currently all "Oh fuck reddit, fuck spez, I deleted my reddit account and all of my comments and will never go back again", but after finally getting away from reddit, why are you so insistent on trying to turn this place back to the worst part of reddit again?

And if the reddit migration on July 1st does indeed occur, do you think they would be ecstatic to see a place that's mostly reddit reposts, but with less """""""""""""""""""content"""""""""""""""""""? If they wanted reddit, why wouldn't they just go back to reddit?

When will we finally be rid of reddit, if we are the ones keeping it on life support?

I will say, if I sound frustrated, it's because I am frustrated, because I actually can't believe I even had to say this. Judging from the comments on this thread yesterday, I think a majority of people here would agree with me. We have something good here, and I'd like to keep it that way a bit longer.

Now, I very much appreciate that our admins here at lemmy.world and their amazing job of preemptively blocking suspicious bot infested instances, so I'm asking politely for @ruud, @Antik and the rest of our good admin team here to put their foot down on not allowing reddit repost spambots and nip this problem in the bud before it takes root, so I can get back to shitposting in peace.

Be better than reddit.

Burn reddit down.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may change after 1 July.

Also, you can just browse your subscribed communities instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless one of your subscribed communities is a victim of this spam. That's kinda rough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't noticed that happening much. In fact, most of the lemmy spam bots I've seen have all been in their own instances, eg lemmy.link and lemmit.online.

However, if it's a subscribed community that you specifically want then you should contact that community's moderators. If they won't take action, then unsubscribing is always an option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Gonna play devil's advocate on this, reposts are very welcome in communities when the content is less personal and prone to discussion. The only thing that I can think of that fits this description is porn, but then again that's half of reddit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I block every reddit reposting bot I see. I left reddit for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and we should keep them out. The no Nazi in punk bar story still applies here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can you give me a few names of these? I fail to recognize which account might be a bot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit has enough repost bots as-is, last thing we need is bots reposting stuff from Reddit. Let's not become another component of the Inhuman Centipede.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a hilarious yet way too descriptive image.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agree, flooding is an existential danger for social media.
As a side note, they're doing a good job of burning it down on their own, let's leave them at it and focus on building something good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say they need curation.

There's thousands of posts getting botted over, but maybe five of those have useful content. Most of the time, the good stuff was in the comments. All that needs doing is a team going through what the bot posts and pruning the junk.

There have been some of those posts that were more than just links to a title on reddit. And there's the image posts like from r/funny where (despite me thinking they're dumb as hell) it is content that is forum neutral. So an outright no repost bots rule isn't any more ideal than them having no restrictions at all.

Like, best of legal advice, as an example. Useless bot because all it does is link back to legal advice posts without any of the comments from BOLA these made the sub entertaining. Stuff like that can go and nobody is missing out. But, stuff like r/art, the value is in the posts, so blanket banning that is a loss.

This needs manual curation like r/goodlongposts used to have until reddit pissed off the human that was doing the curation. Curation works for aggregation and reposts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I respectfully disagree. Curation is impossible with spam, since the moderators are the ones who currently sets up the spambots, and so they will turn a blind eye to it just so their community can grow. Allowing bot posts is too ripe for abuse, which is why I think the repost bots (again, not all bots) should be banned altogether with extreme prejudice.

There's no reason that the good stuff should only be in the comments, I don't want to end up in a situation where the only way to make things usable here is to block the biggest communities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe that one is posting to dedicated subreddits, though? Easy to block if you're not interested.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I blocked that account just now but I’d rather block the whole instance. It’s a neat idea but I see absolutely no reason for it to federate if it’s just an RSS aggregator.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I've seen some interesting posts, but I usually won't comment because it's just going to get spammed out by the next bot post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is why I stopped development of BotIt, if people don't want it then I won't continue making it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you should hang it all up yet.

Thinking aloud - I have a few ideas where bots would be beneficial with targeted criteria from a handful of reasonably decent sources.

It's not necessarily a bad thing to snatch and dump news from their sources for news mags...

Webcomics, podcasts.. there's probably a ton of reasons it wouldnt be spam. Digests instead of multiple posts?

As long as the bot(s) discriminate and segregate, they could really do some good work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am really opposed to using bots to take popular news from Reddit and dump it in our main news subs. It's a poisoned chalice.

In the 8 years I was on Reddit the quality of world news in the main worldnews sub dropped. In the last year I stopped contributing because there was no point.

It used to be news from around the world. Sometime during the Trump/Anti Trump era it slowly got drowned out by the political agendas of various factions of paid shills and bots.

If you look at it now, most of it is Ukraine war news. Basically the facebook crowd vote up what they feel comfortable with from the US news cycle, and the propaganda bots vote up anything that meets their agenda.

I don't think we should let them set the agenda here too. Reproducing their selections would have that effect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apologies. I thought I was pretty clear about direct links to sources that were specifically targeted for their audiences.

Full agreement on leaving reddit with reddit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sorry for the misundertanding. Now that I read it again I can see what you were saying.

I'm fediversing with my morning coffee, and should probably drink more of it before hitting the reply button!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

memes are reposts though tbh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agree, we should start banning repost bots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I understand this perspective, but it is very biased and might just not be true for every case.
E.g. imagine someone wanting to migrate their community to Lemmy, but there are very few people following. Even if they post there, most people might stay in the origin community because there is just so much more content and they can engage with many other people. This is a vicious cycle, because no-one is there, no-one will go there.
Now, bring a repost bot in the game: Suddenly the alternative becomes viable, because the content is also available there. People are much easier able to switch because the difference is minimal. After a while, the original content increases and the necessarity for the repost bot decreases until it can be turned off. Much easier to get people away from Reddit and build a community.

Of course, this is also a specific example. And if there are existing communities with people that suddenly get spammed, that's a problem. But my point is, it's just not black and white, there can be different situations in which something can make sense or not.

Therefore I'd be clearly against blocking something like that sidewide because it can be helpful for single communities. Its totally reasonable for a community mod to block them if they personally conceive the bot to be spam for them, but yeah, I wouldn't agree with the statement that they need to be spam in general.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί