Whoever made this needs to learn how speech bubbles work
memes
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
It's in the style of a text/SMS chat where the bubbles pointing off to the side indicate which "side" of the conversation it applies to.
I'm aware I just don't like it 😏
[rips blunt] The dissonant design philosophies between the text and the image emphasize how technological progress guided by an uncaring market will gradually create greater psychological distance between people over time
The couple in the picture aren't the ones having the conversation. Each person talking is out of frame on either side and awkwardly talking past the couple we see.
Lmao I like this interpretation
I am going to answer here since you are reasonable unlike the others and I got banned by the mods.
Anything that Trump doesn't like must be automatically good in their kneejerk binary reaction.
And they will defend it dogmatically with all means possible and without scepticism.
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/11/meet-wikipedias-ayn-rand-loving-founder-and-wikimedia-foundations-regime-change-operative-ceo/
https://www.dw.com/en/attempted-manipulation-on-wikipedia/video-16628135
https://wikipedia.fivefilters.org/agenda.html
And you wonder about cherrypicking?
That was literally the entirety of your reply.
You cherrypick citogenesis of ten points to criticise.
If you really were 'open minded enough' you could find at least useful info in the other points.
Such as their links to Google trough sponsoring and partnerships.
Or:
*At time of writing, out of a total.of 5.72 million articles, Wikipedia has.....
~195,000 articles that need references (i.e. they have none)
~337,000 articles that need more references
~69,000 articles that need reliable references*
You could bother to look at other threads or other websites online.
BE the change you want to see in the world... and take your damn pants off! 👖:-P
Appropriately, half the people reading this will be pantless on the toilet.
Pants down or pants OFF⁉️😳
What do you mean?! I invert them on my head 'cos I don't want them grubby on the floor...
This person pants 🩳, right here... 😉
I feel singled out.
People dressed as these are not revolutionaries. They're quite happy with the state of the system. The proletariate must start the revolution.
~~proletariate~~ proletariat
Oh, really? My spellcheck didn't flag it. Dang.
There's nothing more expensive than free
Wait, those aren't even pants, those are breeches.
I don't know if the half off comment is intended as a pun but it works well.
FREE THE PANTS!
Swipe right on TNKE TNDR
Can't wait for my free pants. 2 years on the waiting list or pay some corrupt official 10 times the value to get some next Tuesday.
good joke! After we get our revolutionary free pants, we can make your tits should be 100% out.
edit: nice job on the down votes... good luck on your gender appropriate flirting, losers.
Tits out for harambe?