this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
1475 points (95.8% liked)

memes

14388 readers
2431 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Quantum computing (with AI though)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

quantum is gunna be everywhere mmw

[–] [email protected] 232 points 1 week ago (11 children)

NFT was the worst "tech" crap I have ever even heard about, like pure 100% total full scam. Kind of impressed that anyone could be so stupid they'd fall for it.

[–] [email protected] 134 points 1 week ago (29 children)

The whole NFT/crypto currency thing is so incredibly frustrating. Like, being able to verify that a given file is unique could be very useful. Instead, we simply used the technology for scamming people.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (27 children)

I don't think NFTs can do that either. Collections are copied to another contract address all the time. There isn't a way to verify if there isn't another copy of an NFT on the blockchain.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't know this and it's absolutely hilarious. Literally totally undermines the use of Blockchain to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, it doesn't, it just means that Non-Fungible Tokens are...

Fungible...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We got to use the word fungible a lot though, so that was cool

[–] ICastFist 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it has no relation to fungi, which is not cool

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (12 children)

NFTs could have been great, if they had been used FOR the consumer, and not to scam them.

Best thing I can think of is to verify licenses for digital products/games. Buy a game, verify you own it like you would with a CD using an NFT, and then you can sell it again when you're done.

Do this with serious stuff like AAA Games or Professional Software (think like borrowing a copy of Photoshop from an online library for a few days while you work on a project!) instead of monkey pictures and you could have the best of both worlds for buying physical vs buying online.

However, that might make corporations less money and completely upend modern licencing models, so no one was willing to do it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I think there’s a technical hurdle here. There’s no reliable way to enforce unique access to an NFT. Anyone with access to the wallet’s private key (or seed phrase) can use the NFT, meaning two or more people could easily share a game or software license just by sharing credentials. That kind of undermines the licensing control in a system like this.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 week ago (6 children)

For better or worse, AI is here to stay. Unlike NFTs, it’s actually used by ordinary people - and there’s no sign of it stopping anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

ChatGPT loses money on every query their premium subscribers submit. They lose money when people use copilot, which they resell to Microsoft. And it’s not like they’re going to make it up on volume - heavy users are significantly more costly.

This isn’t unique to ChatGPT.

Yes, it has its uses; no, it cannot continue in the way it has so far. Is it worth more than $200/month to you? Microsoft is tearing up datacenter deals. I don’t know what the future is, but this ain’t it.

ETA I think that management gets the most benefit, by far, and that’s why there’s so much talk about it. I recently needed to lead a meeting and spent some time building the deck with a LLM; took me 20 min to do something otherwise would have taken over an hour. When that is your job alongside responding to emails, it’s easy to see the draw. Of course, many of these people are in Bullshit Jobs.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

OpenAI is massively inefficient, and Atlman is a straight up con artist.

The future is more power efficient, smaller models hopefully running on your own device, especially if stuff like bitnet pans out.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unlike NFTs, it’s actually used by ordinary people

Yeah, but i don't recall every tech company shoving NFTs into every product ever whether it made sense or if people wanted it or not. Not so with AI. Like, pretty much every second or third tech article these days is "[Company] shoves AI somewhere else no one asked for".

It's being force-fed to people in a way blockchain and NFTs never were. All so it can gobble up training data.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's because it died out before they all could, Reddit had the nft like aliens thing twitter used to let you use your nft as a profile picture. It just died out way too quick for the general tech companies to get in on it.

If it stayed longer Samsung would have worked out how to put nft tech in their phones

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It is definitely here to stay, but the hype of AGI being just around the corner is definitely not believable. And a lot of the billions being invested in AI will never return a profit.

AI is already a commodity. People will be paying $10/month at max for general AI. Whether Gemini, Apple Intelligence, Llama, ChatGPT, copilot or Deepseek. People will just have one cheap plan that covers anything an ordinary person would need. Most people might even limit themselves to free plans supported by advertisements.

These companies aren't going to be able to extract revenues in the $20-$100/month from the general population, which is what they need to recoup their investments.

Specialized implementations for law firms, medical field, etc will be able to charge more per seat, but their user base will be small. And even they will face stiff competition.

I do believe AI can mostly solve quite a few of the problems of an aging society, by making the smaller pool of workers significantly more productive. But it will not be able to fully replace humans any time soon.

It's kinda like email or the web. You can make money using these technologies, but by itself it's not a big money maker.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Does it really boost productivity? In my experience, if a long email can be written by an AI, then you should just email the AI prompt directly to the email recipient and save everyone involved some time. AI is like reverse file compression. No new information is added, just noise.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 week ago (52 children)

AI and NFT are not even close. Almost every person I know uses AI, and nobody I know used NFT even once. NFT was a marginal thing compared to AI today.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Every NFT denial:

"They'll be useful for something soon!"

Every AI denial:

"Well then you must be a bad programmer."

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If a technology is useful for lust, military or space it is going to stay. AI/machine learning is used for all of them, nft's for none.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vivendi 59 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Another banger from lemmites

Mate, you can use AI for porn

If literally -nothing- else can convince you, just the fact that it's an automated goon machine should tell you that we are not going to live this one down as easily as shit like NFTs

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Mate, you can use AI for porn

A classic scarce resource on the internet. Why pick through a catalog of porn that you could watch 24/7 for decades on end, of every conceivable variation and intersection and fetish, when you can type in "Please show me naked boobies" into Grok and get back some poorly rendered half-hallucinated partially out of frame nipple?

just the fact that it’s an automated goon machine should tell you that we are not going to live this one down

The computer was already an automated goon machine. This is yet one more example of AI spending billions of dollars yet adding nothing of value.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate to break it to you, but AI isn't going anywhere, it's only going to accelerate. There is no comparison to NFT's.

Hint: the major governments of the world were never scrambling to produce the best, most powerful NFT's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (52 children)

Oh, it's gonna be so much worse. NFTs mostly just ruined sad crypto bros who were dumb enough to buy a picture of an ape. Companies are investing heavily in generative AI projects without establishing a proper use case or even its basic efficacy. ChatGPTs newest iterations are getting worse; no one has a solution to hallucinations; the energy costs are astronomical; the entire process relies on plagiarism and copyright infringement, and even if you get by all of that, consumers hate it. AI ads are met derision or revulsion, and AI customer service is universally despised.

This isn't like NFTs. It's more like Facebook and VR. Sure, VR has its uses, but investing heavily in unnecessary and unwanted VR tools cost Facebook billions. The difference is that when this bubble bursts, instead of just hitting Facebook, this is going to hit every single tech company.

load more comments (52 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You might be waiting a long time, friend. NFTs were truly useless (besides ripping people off). AI actually has its uses and isn't totally worthless.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That internet fad is gonna die any day now! And who's really going to use iPhones? They'll never take off!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (22 children)

NFTs were just star registries. Pay a fee, and you can claim to own a certain star.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I genuinely find LLMs to be helpful with a wide variety of tasks. I have never once found an NFT to be useful.

Here's a random little example: I took a photo of my bookcase, with about 200 books on it, and had my LLM make a spreadsheet of all the books with their title, author, date of publication, cover art image, and estimated price. I then used this spreadsheet to mass upload them to Facebook Marketplace in bulk. In about 20 minutes I had over 200 facebook ads posted for every one of my books, which resulted in getting far more money than if I made one ad to sell all the books in bulk; I only had to do a quick review of the spreadsheet to fix any glaring issues. I also had it use some marketing psychology to write attractive descriptions for the ads.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI, in some form, is here to stay, but the bubble of tech companies shoving it into everything will pop at some point. As for what that would look like, it would probably be like the dot-com bubble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The AI hype will pass but AI is here to stay. Current models already allow us to automate processes which were impossible to automate just a few years ago. Here are some examples:

  • Detecting anomalies in roentgen and CT-scans
  • Normalizing unstructured information
  • Information distribution in organizations
  • Learning platforms
  • Stock photos
  • Modelling
  • Animation

Note, these are obvious applications.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (7 children)

OP here to clarify: With AI Hype Train I meant the fact that so many people are slapping AI onto anything just to make it sound cool like at this point I wouldn't be surprised if a bidet company slapped AI into one of their bidets...

I'm not saying AI is gonna go anywhere or doesn't have legitimate uses but currently there is money in AI and everybody wants to get AI into their things to be cool & capitalize on the hype:

Same thing with NFT's and blockchains. The technology behind it has it's legitimate uses but not everyone is slapping it onto things like a few years ago just to make fast bank.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Hey, A1 is great so long as you have it on the right dish. I dunno that I'd call it a "hype train" either, because it's been around for years!

/s

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (8 children)

AR is already being hyped.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Got my Google Glass pre-ordered

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The difference is that AI is actually quite useful in some areas like medical research. Language models like Chatgpt are also useful when used right. It's the stable diffusion stuff (image generation) that is crap and the fact that companies keep shoving AI features that no one asked for down our throat.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I do feel that, unlike Crypto, AI (or, to drop the buzzwords, LLMs and other machine-learning based language processors and parsers) will end up having a place in the world.

As it is NOW, the AI hype train is definitely an investment bubble and it will definitely explode in a glorious fashion eventually. Taking a lot of people down with it.

But unlike Crypto, AI does -- It like does things, you know? Even if I personally feel like it's mostly only good for a toy, all my attempts to use it for anything society would deem "valuable" were frustrated, but at least I can RP with it when my friends aren't available. It is a thing that exists and can be used.

Crypto was funny because it was literally useless. Just an incredibly wasteful techno-fetishistic speculative vehicle with precisely zero shame about being that.

As for what's next, I think Quantum Computing might be it. That is, assuming the Tech Industry even survives the bubble's burst in its current form. Because everyone in the industry is putting all their eggs including theoretical eggs that haven't even been laid, and in fact there's not even a chicken in this AI hype train. And even with AI becoming part of people's lives, as I predict it indeed will, when the bubble does burst it might end up hitting the reset button on who is truly in charge of things.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Uhhh,

Unlilke NFT's , AI is actually doing real things?!?

I'm mean, it's not replacing peoples jobs,

But I'm actively using it to remove noise, recognize objects, up-scaling, motion planning, create songs, create images, condense large amounts of text, christ, lots of actual useful tools....

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I hate that we call any algorithm that gets information by looking at data "AI." If people consider something like linear regression (a supervised model) to be "AI", then "AI" isn't going to pass. Hell, even neural networks are just a shit ton of addition and multiplications.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You're assuming there will be a next time. When the AI bubble bursts, and it will, the whole economy will go down with it. AI companies are massively in debt and have a product that ranges from utter shit to kinda okay, and absolutely no sane way to monetize it. Everyone outside of tech, you know, the customers, fucking hate AI. It has stolen their work, jeopardized their livelihoods, wasted their resources and made the most insufferable asshats in history very wealthy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›