92
Just imagine if they spent the money on feeding the poor or tackling global warming instead.
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)
Hardware
1495 readers
120 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - [email protected]
- Gaming Laptops - [email protected]
- Laptops - [email protected]
- Linux Hardware - [email protected]
- Mechanical Keyboards - [email protected]
- Microcontrollers - [email protected]
- Monitors - [email protected]
- Raspberry Pi - [email protected]
- Retro Computing - [email protected]
- Single Board Computers - [email protected]
- Virtual Reality - [email protected]
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well no thats not possible because [insert one of three stupid ass koolaid guzzling excuses here]. The orphan crushing machine demands innovation don't you see.
We need to pour that money into tech innovation to produce a faster and more efficient orphan crushing machine. A faster machine means each crushed orphan suffers for slightly less time. All my effective altruist friends agree
If you live in a virtual world you can pretend the orphan crushing machine doesn't exist.
This is how you know that polemics about "free markets" and competition require a critical eye. One would think that in a truly competitive market there would be no profits to fund a $45 billion passion project of the CEO,
I for one am somewhat of the opposite view, to a degree anyway. I think we need more money spent on passion projects like that, since it means the money is actually cycling back into the economy instead of just being hoarded like a dragon's hoard. I agree that in an ideal world there wouldn't be billionaires at all to do this kind of thing, but in this case at least I think it's a good thing the money is actually being spent (theoretically).
Jfc metaverse is still a thing?!
Still not a thing