[email protected] is fantastic if you have any familiarity with Star Trek.
[email protected] and [email protected] are also both high on my list. I'm so happy there are two of them, both are active, and both are mostly unique from one another.
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)
Moving to: m/AskMbin!
63 readers
9 users here now
### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**
founded 1 year ago
Shitjustworks NCD is more technical and obscure and shitposting-oriented instead of meme-oriented, like pre-Ukraine NCD, and I actually prefer it, even though I'm incapable of contributing. On one hand, I kind of wish we could merge and get everyone in the same place; on the other hand, I would hate to dilute it.
There's a ton of good munis / zines on the Solarpunk instance (slrpnk.net).
I spend a considerable amount of time on [email protected], [email protected], and (self-promotion alert) [email protected]
Can we take a brief moment to give @[email protected] some props? Because this person is all over my feed and it's wonderful. Keep up the good work, my most excellent compadre. 👏 👏 👏
Thank you! 🙏 I'm mostly hoping to help grow communities, because I'm running out of things in my folders to post. XD
Unless... I broke out the She-Ra memes again...
I was trying to support @Animemes when I first got here, but ran out of saved stuff a month ago, and the community is pretty quiet now. I even resubscribed to animemes on reddit recently, but they haven't posted anything worth stealing yet. ._.
I’m still learning good communities for me so I clicked for suggestions for myself. Came to talk about different types of posts. When I saw your title I knew I’d want to read the whole discussion. Some posts are like that, and those are the ones I want to spend time on because every response contributes. Some posts are a practical question with a narrow set of answers. If it’s not a question I share, and it it already has several responses, there’s probably no point in me contributing. Some posts are open minded discussions where it’s so interesting to absorb the views that others share, and maybe join in. Some posts are fights. Those aren’t worth participating in.
I’m sure I’m leaving a lot out. And maybe others don’t make these calculations at all. I just happened to notice, as I was scrolling topics, the criteria I use for deciding whether or not to click and read.
Anyone else have these thoughts? Or disagree?
I don’t consciously make these calculations either, but what you just described sounds exactly like how I choose what to click on. Also came here for suggestions!
I’ll say that I’ve looked up hobbies I enjoy but don’t think about much so I can boost my engagement on the Fediverse. Normally I wouldn’t bother, but I want to help this place grow, so I’ve let in things that I have a milder interest in as well as my usual interests. This is also how I get variety in the posts I see, as I usually stick to /sub. When I wander out, it’s on purpose and to a specific known community, because /all usually has some depressing political news or ragebait that would get me to outrage-click. I’m here to have a good time, not to doomscroll or get angry. Kbin has no algorithm intended to keep us scrolling on it, but those things do generate the most engagement, so it’s only natural they end up on /all frequently enough (though not as frequently as they’d appear on the popular page on Reddit) that I feel a desire to avoid /all.
That's actually one of the reasons I created this post, to kind of cast a wider net so I can engage more to help growth. I currently have around 20 or so subscriptions, but I'd say really only 2 or 3 are super active. Which isn't a bad thing per se, but in the magazines I do post threads in, I sometimes seem to be the only person posting. But the content has got be there somehow!
I find that I do click more on threads that I feel like I can actually contribute something to, or are interesting enough to me to see other individuals' viewpoints. And when it does start to degrade into fight I back out, because I did not come here for negativity.
After writing this post I reflected a bit more on types of conversations, and made a little graphic to illustrate my transportation metaphor for the internet: Some are walking, some jogging, some biking — traveling independently at varying speeds low enough to pay attention and stop to interact. Some are traveling at high speeds loudly polluting; they interact with others by honking, crashing, or running over. It is pointless for a pedestrian to converse with the blare of a car horn.