Win11 is a better daily driver than any Linux system. (If it was different, I'd probly start hating Linux too.) Win11 HyperV is a well developed virtualization system. Run a VM if you need Linux. There's also the M$ linux-on-windows thing, but I don't enjoy having the OS and the guest mix like that, so a VM is best for me.
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
89 points (96.8% liked)
Linux Gaming
17690 readers
310 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm doing the same thing. Someone recommended Bazzite to me and it seems to come with a lot of the compatibility stuff ready to go. I haven't really gotten into it much but my plan is to dip my toes in with it and at least learn the names of the apps and what they do. After that If I want to switch I hope it will be easier. The biggest hurdle for me is just knowing what's what.
I do love the file browser on it already. I'm doing the same stuff with it I had to install 2 3rd party apps in Windows for.
Bazzite is definitely a good choice for a PC that you'll use like a console. But because it's an atomic OS (immutable) downloading less popular apps may be a bit annoying. It's not impossible but just keep that in mind if you ever get frustrated. If an immutable OS isn't working for you, then id give Nobara OS a try.
I'll keep that in mind. So far haven't hit any walls other than FreeCAD running like ass but I'm not sure that's Bazzite's problem or something else. Still digging into it.
Fedora is a safe bet. Kinoite is their atomic distro and bazzite is a fork of that as well as steamOS which is great for gaming.
I wouldn't recommend Mint if you plan on gaming on it all. It has of lot of older packages from what I've heard.
Bazzite and CachyOS are also worth looking into
You're going to get a hundred different answers about distros. There are a lot of knowledgeable people who forget what the beginner experience is like.
Mint is universally recommended and well loved. It works well and you can't go wrong. It uses Cinammon desktop environment and I wanted KDE so I didn't go for it.
Fredora is also top tier and again you can't go wrong. This comes in many flavours (including Bazzite which is an immutable Fedora distro pre-set towards gaming, or Nobara).
When you're wiping your drive anyway and setting up new and fresh, then this is the best time to install different distros and test drive them for a few hours/days. Ultimately this is not a life changing decision; and your choice can always be changed later.
I personally did all this a year ago and settled on OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. It has been great and this distro doesn't get recommended enough. The desktop environment will be your daily use experience. The underlying distro will be your mechanics under the hood. I would suggest you pick something "beginner friendly" unless you really want to take on a steeper learning curve.
OpenSUSE is awesome, they're undergoing a restructuring and rebranding right now. Which means that promotion of use and updates could be slow or even pause. They were asked to return to the community for a new governance model. They should emerge the other side with a different name and branding, as SUSE asked them to stop using the name. It's a transition time for the distro.
Mints outdated drivers can definitely cause issues for beginners.
It did definitely do that for me. Tried that and Pop.
Luckily this community helped me figure it out together with information found searching the web. If I wasn’t persistent and somewhat tech savvy I’d be stuck for sure.
And this is why Linux is still far from mass adoption. Normie's will not be able to troubleshoot this stuff right out of the box. If there's going to be widespread adoption then Linux needs to come pre-installed and set up, and preferably unbreakable (like Steam OS).
I've been using Mint for a while now, Haven't had any issues so far. What issues did you have?
The kernel doesn’t support Mesa 25 drivers out of the box, so Radeon 9000 cards wouldn’t work properly. No games would run. Also the version of Steam downloaded directly from their website didn’t want to start, no window shows up and it just runs in the background.
Easy fix after a quick ~~Google~~ Qwant search. But someone who doesn’t have at least some deeper experience with either MacOS or Windows wouldn’t know where to start to fix such an issue either.
Other than this it’s been fine.
I had to say this yesterday, and I guess the universe didnt like that.
My laptop shit the bed today morning. My work laptop, running Mint booted into a black screen, had to clean install to get the screen back on.
It broke again in the evening, but then I had TimeShift snapshots to recover with.
Need to figure out some way to either make it nimble enough to recover from the black boots quickly or fix them for good.
I'm sure Mint is fine but it's hideous so I've never touched it.
Bazzite comes with a whole lot of stuff out of the box that makes the Linux experience so much easier, and the gaming experience so much better, so that's what I usually recommend.
In my experience, Ubuntu and Ubuntu variants make for a great daily driver for someone who is new to Linux. When I started to get into Linux, I just found the most Q&A content and support for Ubuntu as I googled my way through it. This plentiful support was specifically geared towards newcomers, which I felt the other Linux communities lacked in comparison.
I find endeavor really simple. All the goodness of arch and it just works??? with AUR? Woah! I think you are better off choosing a desktop environmental. That really changes the experience rather than the distro. I am a big time KDE fangirl myself and will thrive on any distro with KdE Plasma on.
Ended up going with Nobara KDE. So far just about everything I've tried to do just worked flawlessly.
Why not stay with Nobara KDE? Its nice to have gaming configured out of the box.
I’m not changing anytime soon. I ended up choosing Nobara after this thread ☺️
That is what I started with! Later I found it too unstable and caved in for endeavour. but hey enjoy, I had a great time with it.
Another vote for fedora here.
I use regular workstation. I like gnome so that fits. And I found when I set up arch exactly the way I liked, I was just recreating the fedora experience ;)
It’s not bleeding edge but I don’t think anyone really needs that unless you just bought a brand new vid card or mobo etc. If your components are common and 6mo+ old fedora is new enough.
I really don’t have issues with it. It seems to have become the new Ubuntu (install it and it just works).
If you are going to game daily, I would recommend Nobara. Which is based on Fedora, but has all the gaming stuff precompiled/installed and ready to go from the start, Which makes getting started with gaming much easier. Its very user friendly to boot.
but if you just want an binary answer between Mint or Fedora, I'd say Fedora.. since you will still be able to find, install, and benefit from a lot of the Nobara stuff, even if its not included in the box from the start.
Nobara is actually one I highly considered. But I keep reading that base Fedora is more stable.
Of that’s not true I love the features Nobara comes with.
I mean, base Fedora probably is more stable.
Playing games requires an lot of extra stuff, and the kernal is more bleeding edge in nobara to keep those GPU updates (if AMD) and performance tweaks fresh and useful.
but generally speaking from my experience, Nobara is no more or less stable than anything else, windows or linux. And any issue I did rarely had was typically resolved with a reboot, and generally from a game.
You guys might have talked me into Nobora actually.
I’ve not been someone who’s favored stability over new tech and performance on Windows, so why should I on Linux?
Also, like others have said, changing the Distro if I hate it isn’t exactly the end of the world anyways.
The main issue with nobara is that it's handled by a single person. Almost everything you get on nobara you can get with a few commands on the terminal in fedora; and whatever patches they have under the hood will at best get a marginal performance boost and at worst cause major crashes and issues.
Nobara is a solid choice for people that don't like to tweak their system too much because it comes with everything you need to play games from the get-go. If you're more of a power user there's very little reason to pick it over fedora or arch.
That’s the reason I was considering Fedora instead. But I just installed Nobara, so I’ll see how it goes.
I’m VERY curious about Arch, but I’ll stay on this distro for a little bit(I think)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's more stable. But as I understand, it doesn't come with any proprietary drivers or blobs, so you've got to do an amount of tinkering and configuring to get it running for gaming. Especially if you've got Nvidia GPU.
Whereas with nobara or bazzite, those features are baked in already, by professionals.
You need them either way, so my question is, who do you trust more? Yourself? Or the developers behind the gaming oriented flavors of Fedora?
I went with Bluefin, based on silverblue, based on Fedora. It has all the gaming stuff I need, plus like bazzite, it's immutable (ish), so while it's harder to do some stuff the normal Linux way, it's also significantly more stable, because nothing I do or install ever touches the core operating system files. I can't break anything, and this makes me happy 😁
load more comments
(2 replies)
Stability is a trap. It sounds automatically appealing but is so much more trouble it's worth for the benefits it provides, especially for a daily driver system intended for gaming, not a long-forgotten server running in a closet that's been doing the exact same thing for 20 years. The gaming ecosystem is not stable, new games are released constantly, new clients are released constantly, new updates and DLC are released constantly, new drivers are released constantly. You have no choice but to keep up and if your OS is not keeping up because it's "stable" you're in for a world of pain.
If you try to use a stable OS for an unstable goal you'll be fighting it all the time, ironically things will be broken far more often than any "unstable" equivalent, because you won't be able to get the latest rapid updates you need when you need them. To get things to work you'll have to force different updates into place one by one, piece by piece, then future updates will get broken because you'll end up with two copies of things that are conflicting one of which got manually installed.
Stable distros absolutely have their place, there's nothing wrong with them and they're typically the most used and popular distros because they are ridiculously good at doing what they're designed to do. But playing games on your desktop is not what they're designed to do.
I disagree that stable distros aren't good at general purpose gaming systems, they work fine unless you have very new hardware.
And sometimes the newer stuff csn bring more problems than a stable distro, depending on your hardware.
As an example, my system is an nvidia laptop with an external monitor. Unfortunately, the Nvidia driver is absolutely unusable under Wayland with this setup, which was a bummer for me, as I wanted to use Fedora with it, but starting with Fedora 41, X11 was completely phased out, so I couldn't fall back to it.
I'm not a fan of openSUSE tumbleweed or Arch based distros, which do still support X11, which left me with the more Stable distros. Mint worked flawlessly with my setup, and I have no issue gaming.
Tl;dr there's more nuance to stability vs bleeding edge, and both have their place.
That’s an excellent point.
I run a brand new GPU, I like to play both very old and brand new games. I sometimes overclock my hardware, I’ve been really into modding games in the past.
Stable isn’t really how my gaming ecosystem is on Windows either. Not to mention Windows, Nvidia, AMD etc have always had a element of instability to it. I’ve ran beta updates on my PC for years and also do that on my phone. The amount of times I’v messed around in regedit, cmd, bios, eventviewer etc. is beyond what I can remember. I’ve been adopting windows versions early since Vista came out too.
I’ve never really been happy with stable. Maybe I this question should be «Arch vs Fedora» instead, but I’m not cocky enough(yet) I guess 😂
Any reason to go with Nobara over Bazzite?
Nobara is not immutable, which is a plus for some people. I'd use it over Bazzite because I like the ability to fix things that break rather than just rolling back to an older image and hoping that the next update unfucks whatever the maintainers broke in the last update, but some people are fine with that process, so for them there is Bazzite.
Bazzite has never broke for me. One of the advantages of atomic immutable distros is that there's no rush to push a new image. Either the whole image is updated when it already works, or it doesn't get shipped. None of the issues of pushing a single package update without testing that later turns out to be incompatible with a different package update.
Yeah exactly. Worst case, I reboot my system and it's fine again lol.
I see people sometimes try to act like immutable is only for newbies or people who don't like tinkering, and it's just not true.
It's beginner-friendly, sure. But you're really not that limited in what you can do, you just need to learn the different ways that they're done on immutable (rpm-ostree for example).
There is a slight learning curve, but after a few months, I really grew to like the entire concept of immutable and atomic. I'm not sure I would ever go back to Arch (if I want anything from AUR I just start up my Arch distrobox).
I have had broken updates pushed on my system with Bazzite, and the fact that I couldn't do anything about it just rubbed me the wrong way. That's just me though, some people are fine with rolling back to an older image, no hate lol
I have never used bazzite to give you an honest answer to that.
all I can say is that I was distro hopping for a good while after running into roadblocks on ubuntu, and Nobara is just where everything clicked into place with usability, and ease of gaming.
seconding Nobara, I've been using it daily for close to two years now and have been super happy with it.
Most of distros use the same projects code-wise, some just add some patches or lag months behind. I mean, it doesn't really matter, just do it. You'll either be happy with anything or outgrow whatever you pick up now. And either sooner or later land using one that you will decide is absolutely the best, or just have vague preferences in the end
But it's the journey that does it, not a particular distro
I like this answer!
As a long term Linux user I highly recommend the Universal Blue (immutable Fedora) spins. It's been rock solid on my desktop and 10x better on a laptop I thought was a lemon because Ubuntu would crash or do other weird things about once a week. The immutableness hasn't really caused me a lot of grief except when I tried to connect my 15yo printer (I just relented and got a new printer) when I had to go through a distrobox.
Specifically, Bazzite uses these and I have been really impressed since switching my daily driver from manjaro to bazzite.
Bazzite also ships with a lot of gaming software and tweaks/fixes preconfigured which is nice if that is important to you.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's the wonderful thing about distros, you can keep trying different ones until you find one you love or just get tired of changing lol.
I absolutely despise installing Windows. Takes forever.
Linux distros take like 10 minutes. I love it!
And you don't have to fuck with drivers, especially for basic shit like the friggin hard drive. No forced accounts either!
load more comments
(2 replies)
Hah. I just went with Fedora on a new build, got all the way to setting up all the stuff I need that computer to do and found that it seems the power management is borked and sometimes it just decides to die on a black screen after being left unattended for no discernible reason.
That doesn't mean anything to you, but I wanted to whine in public about it. If you want to factor in my specific set of bugs feel free to do so, though.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Of those two, I think Fedora is the better choice since the packages are more up to date. Fedora with Plasma is a great choice anyway. It's also a large distro with lots of online support. Try it out!
I use zorin. I can use it right away after I install for most things and over time I have added a few things. I do find the gui software interface annoying (its an ubuntu spin so same as ubuntu) so either download the ubuntu option for things on the web so it is just like installing with windows or I do apt at the command line. Its good for running windows software but not necessarily gaming as it is by no means bleeding edge. So its all about stability and out of box usage that gives you an interface that is very windows like.
view more: next ›