this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
963 points (99.4% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2266 readers
752 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Using modern english phrases to convey meaning to modern audiences is usually fine to me, as long as they don't reference modern history or events. but what really pisses me off is movies like "The Great Gatsby" that take place during the 1920s and have JayZ and Lana del ray playing at a rich person's party

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, We Will Rock you wouldn't have even been written during A Knights Tale, so unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

They owned it though in Knight's Tale...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

RoMeO aNd JuLiEt WaSn'T sEt iN CaLiFoRnIa

u rn

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

“Let fly!”

[–] NostraDavid 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

One of a few movies that could've used a "Fire!" was the intro of Robin Hood: Men in Tights (fire arrows, get it?), AND THEY DON'T EVEN DO IT!

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

for the haters :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volley_fire#Bows

The co-ordination and timing could probably be resolved with musical instruments, which were used to relay orders, messages etc.

EDIT : Also, what did OP expect, for all the characters to speak Old English?

[–] Colloidal 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Loose" works. As in "Draw!" ... "Loose!".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Archers also didn't usually shoot upwards to arc their shots. It loses power, reduces accuracy, and makes it more likely for them to hit armor, not less.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they're using indirect fire they certainly would. Such as shooting over friendly formations.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Guess what you also didn't usually do?

It's not that it never happened, but generally speaking it was a bad idea. You'd only get archers using indirect fire at long ranges.

There are however accounts of infantry kneeling so the archers can fire over them. Otherwise archers would be employed in skirmish lines in front of the main formations and then fall back into the main body as the lines approached.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

There's only one way to solve this, you both need to shoot arrows at each other.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Often times, I think of movies or stories as the story teller as translating for the audience. You don't watch Troy and think it's odd the characters are speaking English.

It's acceptable to complain if the work is nonfiction and meant to be for education.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Yeah, or a sequence of "nock, draw, fire/loose/shoot" commands. Warbows cannot be held that long ffs.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›