this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
114 points (91.9% liked)

Linux

52690 readers
479 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know Gnome is the default on popular distros: Fedora, Ubuntu, Rhel, Pop OS (it's Cosmic Desktop yes but it is still based on Gnome)...etc. But Gnome just doesnt work for me. I would pick XFCE - stable and no BS.

Before Manjaro and their cetificate shenanigan, I used to use their XFCE version. At the time, it was marketed as the "Flagship Manjaro version". I went 4 years without any problems and I did tinker a lot, just couldnt get their XFCE to break.

After a tough Arch or Gentoo installs, I just want to put XFCE on and call it a day.

What about you guys?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

KDE, it's the swiss army knife of DEs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

KDE, always

Used it since I switched to the Linux Desktop 25 years ago. Quickly tried gnome, and others, and hated it.

KDE is fast, efficient, looks awesome, is ready to work with, and highly customizable

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

KDE plasma. Coming from 30 years of running exclusively windows it's just the most comfortable and easy for me to use (way more than Gnome). Easily configurable, works. Can't ask for more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

KDE plasma, unless it's on a tablet, then Gnome

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably KDE, it's the most 'complete' feeling to me with settings and GUI for most things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

KDE Plasma for ease of use if using Nvidia Otherwise Hyprland or exwm

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

MATE has been on most of my machines, except the BSD ones.

But past year or so, I have grown a fondness towards ctwm, and gradually migrated my machines to it, Linux and BSD alike.

It is not a DE, but the fact that I have to assemble my suite of software myself on my machines, makes the point of using DEs moot.

[–] the16bitgamer 5 points 2 days ago

Cinnamon for 2 reasons

  1. KDE is missing a lot of features which still only works in Gnome. Like the taskbar Calendar app syncing events with services like Google Calendar

  2. cinnamon is extremely stable and doesn’t move your icons around when you connect to an external display with your laptop and the display has a different resolution.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

KDE. Been upgrading the same environment for 5 years just keeps getting better.

I started around maybe KDE 3?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That's not too hard a question for me, I've been using the same DE for years: KDE

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

KDE the customization is off the charts

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

This isn't even hard. KDE without a second thought.

I regularly try other desktops, and I regularly come back to the only desktop with any sort of reasonable thought put into it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

KDE for sure. The modern versions look exactly like how I want a desktop environment to look out of the box, and they keep the full range of customizability that a desktop should, IMO, allow it's users to have. Which is something Windows just kept slowly getting rid of over the years.

I also prefer to have a taskbar that is ever present with a traditional start menu that's cleanly organized by category rather than the current full screen pop up "activities" search thing gnome does nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am absolutely with you about i3. Simply great (there is also dwm or qtile)! But it is a WM, not a DE, what OP asked about.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean switching between the DE xfce and the WM i3wm, right? Yep, this works and it can indeed make life sometimes easier to have a DE and a WM aside each other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah, basically just running xfce but replacing xfwm4 with i3
i was kinda surprised how well it worked tbh, i had been using i3 on it's own for like a year before i tried it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, I did not know about the possibility of replacing xfwm4 with i3. I too am using i3 for some years and like a lot to have a clean surface which facilitates focussing on my tasks. However, never thought about integrating it in a DE.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

XFCE would be my choice too

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

Definitely Gnome here. Though I have a long list of notes, it mostly just works exactly like I expect with little friction or guessing. I donate $100/year to both Gnome and KDE since they are both good pieces of software, and I love that I get to chose mine. Further, I think KDE is the logical choice for something like the SteamDeck where it's going to have a lot of gamers that expect computers to work like Windows. (even if I don't like it, >_<)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Switched from i3 to sway to hyland. I like the virtual desktop setup and noiseless facing interaction.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

KDE for the desktop and xfce for the laptop

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

I keep coming back to KDE time and time again. It's so easy to mess with, I can set it up exactly how I like it without much effort, and it always looks good because someone else did all the work making themes and widgets I use.

That said, I love XFCE, I'm just trash with CSS so it takes me forever to get it how I like, and on my Surface I can't get the scaling to work so everything is beyond tiny.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Always wanted to like gnome but never could, and xfce is fine but I much prefer KDE, it is verry likely that I'll actually keep it till my pc breaks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's the beauty of gnome: they don't give a single fuck if you like it. You can return the favor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Gnome has the apple philosophy that the user conforms to technology, not the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

Apple actually had good visionaries and design decisions, sometimes.

Never been a fan of apple's hardware decisions, but their software is routinely state-of-the-art even to this day.

They value treating the user like a human instead of a programmer. GNOME values removing as many features as possible to make their jobs easier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No shade to Gnome, because there is a place for them in the ecosystem, but this is why I moved from Gnome 2 to KDE (with a few stops along the way). One size will not fit all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm a long time supporter of Xfce, but I have to say Cinnamon these days. It's light on resources while being feature rich. Also it's the default on Mint and it just works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I use XFCE, but I like Cinnamon too. I use Nemo and Xed instead of Thunar and...whatever.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago

GNOME because it works out of the box like GNOME

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Cinnamon by and far.

I've used so many distros and DEs I don't even know where to begin, but Cinnamon got me hooked for the long run. It's legitimately the most polished and "ready to run" DE I've ever used, yet still allowing for far more customization than Windows ever offered.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›