this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1223 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

69913 readers
1997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Sad to see you leave (not really, tho'), love to watch you go!

Edit: I bet if any AI developing company would stop acting and being so damned shady and would just ASK FOR PERMISSION, they'd receive a huge amount of data from all over. There are a lot of people who would like to see AGI become a real thing, but not if it's being developed by greedy and unscrupulous shitheads. As it stands now, I think the only ones who are actually doing it for the R&D and not as eye-candy to glitz away people's money for aesthetically believable nonsense are a handful of start-up-likes with (not in a condescending way) kids who've yet to have their dreams and idealism trampled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Horrabin 6 points 1 month ago

This sounds like socialism is good for capitalists

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good. If I ever published anything, I would absolutely not want it to be pirated by AI so some asshole can plagiarize it later down the line and not even cite their sources.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Alright, I confess! Almost all of my training in computer programming came from copyrighted material. Put the cuffs on me!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

🤞🤞 🙏

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Good, fuck "AI" fuck copyright, fuck patents, fuck proprietary closed-source software, fuck capitalism, fuck billionaires, and fuck you, Sam, in particular.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

To be fair copyright is a disease. But then so is billionaires, capitalism, business, etc.

I mean, if there's a war, and you shoot somebody, does that make you bad?

Yes and no.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Oh no! How could we ever live without AI?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (14 children)

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

My main takeaway is that some contrived notion of "national security" has now become an acceptable justification for business decisions in the US.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t think they’re wrong in saying that if they aren’t allowed to train on copyrighted works then they will fall behind. Maybe I missed it in the article, but Japan for example has that exact law (use of copyright to train generative AI is allowed).

Personally I think we need to give them somewhat of an out by letting them do it but then taxing the fuck out of the resulting product. “You can use copyrighted works for training but then 50% of your profits are taxed”. Basically a recognition that the sum of all copyrighted works is a societal good and not just an individual copyright holders.

https://jackson.dev/post/generative-ai-and-copyright/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, taxes implies a monopoly on the training data. The government profits. The rights holders get nothing back.

If private data is deemed public for AI training then the results of that training (code+weights+source list) should also be deemed public.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'll take him seriously if & when OpenAI lives up to its name.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›