this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
371 points (100.0% liked)

World News

42429 readers
3260 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

U.S.-China tensions are escalating as Trump imposes tariffs on all Chinese goods, prompting Beijing to retaliate and vow to fight “any type” of war.

China is boosting defense spending by 7.2% while portraying itself as a stable global partner.

The fentanyl issue adds to disputes, with Beijing dismissing it as a pretext for tariffs.

China faces economic struggles but is injecting billions to stabilize growth.

If Trump continues escalating tariffs, the trade war could intensify, worsening global economic and geopolitical instability.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Any type of war?

I vote for a war where both "great leaders" beat the shit out of eachother

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Xi would beat the tar outta our bloated excuse for a head of state.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh yeah, I hate Winnie Pooh and I hope he'd have a heart attack before it's over but Pooh would totally beat the stuffing out of Cheeto, so my money would be on Pooh bear

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Honestly facts it would be so embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. A one on one, no holds bared match, mano y mano. Which fat stupid 70+ year old leech will blow a major artery first! Take your bets now!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I was gonna say an all out thumb war between the peoples but I like your idea better.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Choosing this post among many others to say that I am tired of old men declaring wars they have no skin in, for a future they will never leave. The world is starting to mirror the mental images of their deteriorating brains.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If a war happens, whoever wins, we lose. :(

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah. War doesn't determine who is right, but who is left.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

The world would be better without this dumb trade war. People would actually be able to afford a goddamn car, which they only need because the elites took away our fucking trolleys.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Oh wow, are we getting a world war with China and Europe allied against Russia and the US?

Things are all wonky

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

I propose a hell in a cell match between the two Presidents.

[–] [email protected] 136 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I just caught myself almost rooting for China for a moment there. It has been a wild month.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Me too, man, me too.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Trust me, they aren’t. But neither are the Americans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

When a nation talks about being able to endure something they don't mean the peasants.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Xi is definitely beating Trump at thumb war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If you say Dumb War with a lisp, it sounds like Thumb War

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

winnie the pooh vs. a dumb sack of fat. 3, 2, 1, go!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

China faces economic struggles but is injecting billions to stabilize growth.

The sole manufacturer of everything we buy faces economic struggles. We better fucking hope they don’t because all they have to do is increase prices and we’ll bring them the money on our knees. Good planning on behalf of our capitalist oberlords.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the Cold War was a free printing money machine for 50 years. creating a new one against China makes sense if you're an oligarch whose wealth rides upon govt contracts and endless military industrial expansionism.

and it kinda explains why Putin is manipulating Trump to make him believe they'll choose the US over China in a game of saber rattling. Russia is positioning itself to be the tie-breaker so it can play both sides against one another in lucrative energy/arms deals. maybe they'll even get some real estate out of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are welcome to Florida if they leave the rest of us alone

~/s~

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The problem with imperialists is that they might say they are happy with whatever the current concession is on the table today but will still want to expand their power beyond whatever limits it currently has tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"If war is what the US wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we're ready to fight till the end," China's embassy said on X, reposting a line from a government statement on Tuesday.

Maybe something is lost in translation, but this sounds like they're primarily talking about economic wars. My reading is that they're just saying that they won't accept US bullying, which is good.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The "any other type of war" part is definitely intentional though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I can't fault them for it personally. They've not been the ones going off the rails and stirring international shit.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

China is just as jingoistic as America for domestic consumption. Both countries believe their own propaganda. It's like pre-WW1 Russian Empire and Austria-Hungry all over again. Complete ignorance that any actual conflict would rip them to pieces.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These world leaders desperately want to be seen as tough guys but they're merely overcompensating for their micropenises.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gives a new meaning to sword fight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The sword is mightier than the pen is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Economic, trade, soft power, cyber...sure, hell they stand a chance in those. Combat? Not even close, they would be leveled. The tricky part is using the advantage they have in the first few without receiving the kneejerk usage of the last one against them.

In actuality, the CCP influencing anything outside China (and arguably inside China) is a worst case outcome. The US doing so is very quickly moving up the ranks to the second worst. The world is going to need the EU, and allies, to step up and keep both in check.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Russia just beat us in a war and didn’t have to fire a shot. They’ll have to beat Russia at the disinformation/planting assets game first to win the war with Russia.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Air superiority conflict over the Caribbean!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I choose Naval Battle! Go!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

lol yeah their navy has “army” in its name. Their blue-water capability is simply not in the same league as the USN.

But also, if they wait a few years, I’m sure our military will start to fracture and esprit de corps and morale will largely evaporate because they’re all sick of shooting at other Americans.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I was hoping for a pog war. I hear the pog of war makes things very tricky.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The only time when having SLAM in the headline; describing a pog war is acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OG red and green version only

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is green the version you got when combining blue and yellow?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Green came out in Japan instead of the original Blue in the West.

load more comments
view more: next ›