Zero of this text is green
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
693 points (98.9% liked)
Greentext
5248 readers
1519 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Anonymous" is
Bet
Image source... Asking for a friend
Your friend is in luck, I just went on this quest
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6925683
Reverse Google image search returned a slightly higher resolution version of this screenshot, from which I was able to reverse image search the fanart. I found higher quality versions of the art, but I couldn't find the source until I ventured into a Russian forum where someone posted the artist's name. I always enjoy keeping my skills sharp
My friend said thanks 🙇
Or the exact opposite
If 100+ is the standard, “giga” is way too high. I’m thinking more along the lines of “century seductress”.
Also, that was such a powerful burn I can feel the warmth from here.
Not even a megaslut or a kiloslut. I wonder if a gigaslut is physically possible?
Imagine one partner every ten seconds, during a 40h workweek, 52 weeks a year...
That's just 748,800 partners a year. Let's call it an even 750,000. That's a year and 4 months of professional fucking just to become a megaslut.
Even for someone dedicating themselves to the job 60h a week during their whole life (60 years), would still be just 67 times a megaslut, only 6.7% of the way to become a gigaslut.
The last guy:
Yeah the last guy is me and it's hot as hell.
This is the quality content I come here to read
c/theydidthemathbutwhy
Hecaslut
See, a true slut isn't limited to one partner at a time though, assuming a conventional functional set of anus, vagina, and mouth. If you also allow hands to count for slutification, then you could have as many as five at once.
So, you could triple your numbers and get there in a reasonable period of time
The technologies required to deal with the logistical challenge of moving five men into position every ten seconds would be impressive. That would be 108,000 men entering and leaving the fucking area on a regular rotation for sixty hours a week, plus they're already all pricked up and lubed.
This doesn't even account for the philosophical aspect which is that, does merely penetrating for ten seconds max and skedaddling really constitute of a proper, quantifiable fuck? And if that is already dubious, the grounds for the ten-second handy are even shakier. New disciplines of philosophy would have to be erected (heh) to tackle such a quandry.
Speaking to your second point, is it slutty to jerk off someone you don't know, regardless of the duration? I say yes.
This whole discussion, trying to rigorously define terms so that a robust mathematical proof can be given, is basically a plot point in the show Silicon Valley.
Middle... out...
You could have one of those moving sidewalk conveyors, could probably get one going by every 5 seconds or so. I don't think you have to actually fuck to be a slut, a whore yes, but not a slut.
Best of Lemmy
We need the Factorio pros to get in on this.
microtopia is a cute spin on the classic factory game where instead of belts and inserters you have little ants that do all the work of moving things between places, harvesting resources and operating machines, so what I'm saying is that if any of these men want to share in the glory of facilitating the first gigaslut in our history then they better do it with their own two legs (or one, or none).
in the game this is done through pheromone trails, and i do think in real life something similar could be achieved if you just follow the smell.
Don't forget feet, apparently that's a thing.
And who says the men need to make contact? They could just stand in a circle raining down human nectar.
A true slut is creative.
If there’s a special award for daring to do the gross math, I nominate (and salute) you.
And they still wouldn't sleep with you.
What's the old incel joke? What's the difference between a slut and a bitch? A slut will sleep with anyone. A bitch will sleep with anyone but you.
Which is a horrible joke in so many ways, but it so clearly depicts that kind of incel thinking that it merits looking at.
I agree, and personally find "chaste" or "prude" women unattractive.
I find it very fascinating and difficult to relate to that large swaths of the population seem to see it differently. The number of times i've heard some man say "women should all be more modest" is mind-blowing for me.
Women, as all humans, have value within themselves, and if they manage to express that ("self-expression") then the outer world gets to see and share a part of that value. If people don't act on their instincts, they might as well be dead. Non-constructivists "traditionalists" are only dead weight and don't contribute anything to society, and i don't comprehend how some people can see meaning outside of the expressions of the living's soul. That is why self-expression is so important.
No one asks the iron what it wants to be before it's hammered into a crucifix. This is why the religious spend so much time grooming their children for their cult.
Yup. Whenever I encounter excessive chastity, I think “what else is she repressing? What happens if that repression breaks - or never breaks?” It feels fake and uncomfortable. Not an attractive feeling.
TBF, maybe she’s just being totally reasonable but picky, but that doesn’t have the same emotional vibe.
Heres the super duper secret reason for regressives obsessed with chastity in women. Theyre afraid they have a smaller pee pee than some previous dude. Thats all. How much oppression and spilled blood has happened because of man/boys and their penis envy?
in a framework where people are just alive to mate this is a valid theory, but women can also self-express in more ways than offering sex 😂 also, people who only act on their instincts are even more dead than the ones that never act on their instincts. whenever your mode of operation is exactly and only one, never changing, that's not a good thing.
anyways, i agree with the core here, which is that vast amounts of the population heavily communicate what criteria others have to fulfill to be desirable. I'd much rather prefer everyone does what they want and chill out
No, its a valid theory even if women self-express in ways other than sexuality and the post you were responding to wasn't suggesting "only acting on instincts" in the first place. But that our society of repressing sexuality is making most of us miserable. There is only a select few people who seem to actually benefit from this set up, and that's people who either don't actually desire sexuality for direct enjoyment at all or value it and how it interacts with them more for obtaining other things other than sexual things in life.
AN important thing to note, people expressing themselves in ways outside of sexuality can make them sexier. And being sexier can enhance non-sexual aspects of a person.
I think the issue people have is they think wanting sexuality from a person means you are objectifying them by reducing them to sexuality, when in reality its that the sexuality is enhanced by them specifically not being an object. There are many reasons sex with a person and not with a dildo or fleshlight is considered a lot more pleasurable but one of them is that people aren't objects.
Also almost no one only operates in one "mode of operation" anyway. This isn't a real problem except in the minds of prudes projecting an overly simplified perspective on sluts and horndogs. The apparent "obsession" with sex for some people is temporal, some people desire sex up front and then want to do other things once satisfied. Some people want to do other things and then find themselves in the mood after some time with the alternate activity. Its not complicated.
If people don’t act on their instincts, they might as well be dead.
Psychopaths: "Oh boy, here I go killing again."
Wouldn't it be more efficient if you manipulate others into killing for you?
fair enough
btw i think you're confusing "psychopaths" and "sociopaths" here. what you're referring to is sociopaths, i think, who have little concern for human life. Psychopaths, on the other hand, have difficult time making coherent thoughts, but that mostly affects themselves and their ability to work constructively, not so much their environment. just a small fyi
also, sociopaths don't typically kill people quickly or randomly; but rather slowly, by draining their resources out of them, for their own benefit. kinda like what capitalism is doing.
I feel like theres a bit of a leap in logic there, from being open about sex to killing people
also I tho8ght that was a family guy quote and was SEVERELY disappointed when I looked it up
load more comments
(1 replies)
He left himself wide open to that one
Just like his mom too!
view more: next ›