this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
109 points (95.0% liked)

Europe

5865 readers
1112 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Weird how people have been so brainwashed into using that euphemism that they even apply it to a nation hostile to them, actively waging a war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Russia’s “ministry of defence” is pretty reminiscent of in 1984, Oceania’s “ministry of truth”.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

defense or defence

Same same, first one is US, the other is UK spelling.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm German, you guys figure that out amongst yourselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm Dutch.. so we need to balance it out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Swede in France here, défense please.

Or försvaret of course if you want to go down that road.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Puolustuspa, perkele.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And Luxemburg sanitary infrastructure exceeds that of russia, I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Russians have way more outdoor plumbing I bet!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I thought about outdoor toilets ...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

And it's all burning in a pile in Ukraine along with Russia's economy

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The problem is that a) it's not true and b) even if it was, there is not anything to buy for that money.

Russia is running out of hardware, what are they going to do, throw rubles at the Ukrainian defenses?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Russia not only has a massive sabotage-and-disinfo campaign, they also have semi-allies running the US now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

They have NK meat, but that's running out too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

They still have lots of T34 that they haven't used.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Russia still is very capable, has tons of hardware, and is making more. The air force is still looking really good.

Running out doesn’t mean, they will ever actually run out. It just means a weapon will be used more rarely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

They produce around 10 tanks a month, refurbished included. They lose that in 2 days.

Their airforce is looking good? Then where is it? Where is the air superiority? Nowhere to be seen because they'd get shot down.

You're right that they will not run out like I run out of milk, but if you can't replace the losses of tanks and infantry vehicles, you have suddenly to rely on unprotected vehicles and human meat waves. They will not run out totally either, but it will stop them and the possibility to kick them out grows.

[–] Gobbel2000 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Only if you convert rubles by "purchase power parity" as opposed to the market rate, which seems like a weird way to manipulate data to fit some narrative.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Not that weird if most of that spending is domestic.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

PPP is a useful measure to compare wealth although it’s usually based on goods like bread and not tanks. There’s a grain of truth here as the difference in wages alone makes for a huge factor in the overall cost. Having access to many raw materials is a big boon for Russia too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Germany pays their soldiers multiple times what Russians get. There’s also lots of money just spent on pensions for retired soldiers. That money doesn’t lead to any military capability. A huge part of defense spend on goes into personell. Richer countries, not only pay better, they also offer more benefits. Healthcare for example is cheaper in Russia as well.

Comparing spending one to one does not lead to a conclusive answer.

What you actually need to compare is capabilities, volume, readiness, training, and so on.

Another example: NATO often trains winter warfare in Norway, a notoriously expensive country. Russia has much lower costs to conduct exercises for the same environment.

Then there’s existing infrastructure like factories, repair yards, storage bunkers, etc. Europe is still scaling up and building to match Russia’s production rates. Building a new factory, training staff, etc. takes a lot of money and time. Russia is years ahead in many of these areas. Building up from zero is far more expensive than increasing the number of shifts of an existing factory.

So with parity in spending, Russia will have much stronger capabilities than Europe. Europe needs to outspend Russia significantly to catch up and match.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

It's so frustrating how long Europe has been ignoring its need to be self sufficient in military defence. Even with a literal war going on next door and russia actively turning the political systems upside down.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

You’d think the war would be going well for them then

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

EU defense needs to get upped, functional and efficient asap.

That said, Im not sure which data was used here by FT, but reports I've read include Russia currently adding repairing ancient (WWII ) military equipment to a net total production value. I.e. the real added value is considered much lower.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

defence or military spending?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What happening with drones on Ukraine shows that money doesn't always translate to success. When a couple hundred dollar drone can destroy a million dollar tank spending doesn't seem a good proxy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This should worry Europe even more because Russian troops have a real life experience in this kind of warfare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah. That is true

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Is that because the rupees have been hyperinflated?