this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
2 points (75.0% liked)

Technology

1806 readers
375 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

In contrast to models like GPT-4, which can engage in free-form debate

Not having attempted to trigger censored responses from a LLM doesn't mean it is not censored.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

ChatGPT and co are also banned by many the same countries that banned DeepSeek and also most companies. Everyone either uses open source self-hosted models or they use internally produced ones. It's literally no different from how other could-only solutions with embedded tracking are treated.

Also stop comparing GPT-4 model with DeepSeek hosted service. Compare model to model or service to service.

Open source models can be uncensored (which is already the case for DeepSeek R1 model), proprietary cloud-only models can't.

So yes, we should really ask which "transparency" we should be seeking. A whole article written to justify desired result instead manages to prove the opposite correct. Good job Suzannah.