this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
923 points (98.9% liked)

Lefty Memes

4881 readers
65 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ID: photo of Martin Luther King Jr. waving at the crowd during the March on Washington, on it is his quote: "He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented"

  • Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize 1986

Quoted from his acceptance speech -
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1986/wiesel/acceptance-speech/

Elie Wiesel was born in 1928 in the town of Sighet, now part of Romania. During World War II, he, with his family and other Jews from the area, were deported to the German concentration and extermination camps, where his parents and little sister perished. Wiesel and his two older sisters survived. Liberated from Buchenwald in 1945 by advancing Allied troops, he was taken to Paris where he studied at the Sorbonne and worked as a journalist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They took a side, its just not a side you'll admit exists.

When everyone loses faith in the current and future DNC to the point that accelerationism toward complete disolution of the US government seems like the only viable choice, this is what it looks like.

The DNC being in favor of genocide steered muslim voters to want to burn this whole place down. Can you blame them? And its similar for the working poor who are one toothache or splean surgery from living under a bridge. I dont blame them either. But you seem to.

The very visible nationwide rage at the United Health care CEO and the dems being out to lunch on working class struggles-- coupled with the losses across every single demographic shows that this is a universal truth that exists whether you like it to or not. And this isnt about healthcare, its about the entire system of government.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The DNC being in favor of genocide steered muslim voters to want to burn this whole place down.

The muslim vote and Gaza protest votes combined isn't what caused democrats to lose and they didn't want to "burn this whole place down" as you put it, Democrats lost because of their shitty campaign, saying nothing about progressive politics or what people wanted to hear, ontop of all the Gaza stuff, and has the likes of Bill Clinton campaigning for them. Don't blame muslims for the Democrats shitty-ass campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"You shouldn't pay attention to politics it's unhealthy." - My "liberal" "centrist" family. "You should focus on yourself" they say, "It is what it is, can't do anything to change it, work on yourself" they say, as if the most enlightened and reasonable perspective is to put a blanket over your head and pretend that the monsters don't exist. They'd say "It's hard to take you seriously, maybe become a politician or economist" but when you give them reading material written by economists, politicians, as well as lauded minds like MLK Jr or Einstein, they roll their eyes and go "You shouldn't pay attention to politics it's unhealthy, focus on yourself."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I feel like it should be a normal thing to openly stand against fascism. If anyone has a problem with me because of that then they've proven themselves to be people I would never want to interact with in the first place

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s still somewhat incredible to me that the label “Antifa” is used as a pejorative by some of these talking heads.

Uhh, last I checked we committed a whole bunch of boats and soldiers to literally blowing the brains out of nazi skulls on one particular Day…

Opposing fascism should be the default American stance, we’re just riddled with cancer/capitalism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Opposing fascism should be the default American stance, we’re just riddled with cancer/capitalism

And it's crazy, because, as someone who grew up in the 90s/00s, it always was. My public education did not shy away from shitting on Nazis and explaining the dangers of fascism. They started teaching that shit in elementary school.

The brain rot that has set-in over the past two decades or so has just been mind boggling and insane to watch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know, a lot of comments are bringing up voting like there was any chance of votes preventing this. A lifetime of gerrymandering, court stacking, propaganda, and general fuckery led to this, and the only question was when the religious right wing and oligarchs made their move

Voting? That's not shit.

What matters is real change brought by real people.

The people that didn't vote? That wasn't all protest non participation. Voter turnout has always been low because the average person just does not care.

Which means they won't care if the people that do care tear down the currently successful right wing revolution with a counter revolution. All you have to do is keep just enough comfort during transition, and nobody will lift a finger from that group. They will not give a flying fuck at all.

Frankly, even if they did care, they're also the segment least able to do a damn thing about any of it. They lack the will, the training, and the functional personal motivation to do anything but hunker down and wait, even if their comfort level does drop to the bottom.

I can't say that's good or bad, but it is what it is.

It's up to the people that care to make changes. Right now, the right seems to care a fuck ton more than anyone else, so they're pulling it off.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do you mean votes couldn't prevent this? You really think if Kamala had won by the electoral college that Trump would have won anyways??

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

I'm saying that this is the end goal the right wing, particularly the general Republican party and the Christian right in particular have been working towards since Nixon. The southern strategy, combined with the oligarchs dominating the party.

Democrats have never had a good plan to oppose that, and still don't.

Even if Kamala had won, which was never likely, it would have been someone, at some point in the next fifty years because the first Trump term stacked the supreme court, and the party pushed hard to put decisive cases up.

There's no way the halfassed efforts that democrats have been using my entire lifetime would have prevented an eventual lock on Congress and the presidency.

Mind you, I'm fairly convinced that had kamala won, there was a plan in the works for an outright attack. Not a genuine right wing revolution scale attack, but a disruptive series of attacks on the power grid and infrastructure to sow chaos and strengthen the militarization of the police even more, get people used to marshal law, etc. But that's impossible to prove, and unsourceable.

In a roundabout way, any democrat winning would have had exactly as much effect on their long term plans. They've been working at this, laying multiple options down so that as soon as opportunity rose, they could strike in one way or another.

Voting can't fix that. Voting democrat can't fix that for sure. There is no viable alternative party to oppose it, and there's no time to build one, despite the feeble bullshit being tried to rebuild the democrat establishment. You can't take a party that gives lip service to the populace, but works to maintain the status quo of corporate interests on average, and turn it into a serious engine of change.

We're past the point of waiting four years and hoping. We were past that when Biden eked out a win. But nobody took that respite to even try and shift things.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (14 children)

In a similar vein, anyone eligible to vote and chooses not to implicitly supports whoever wins.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

lol no, I'm not going to get mad at my neighbors, I'm going to get mad at people who are actively trying to hurt them, not the ones accidentally doing it

The problem isn't that fascists were voted into the White House. The problem is that there are fascists in the White House. Anything that doesn't address that problem is equally implicit in supporting fascism. Arguing with your neighbors doesn't get fascists out of the White House. If history is anything to go by it has obviously done the opposite

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think they are linked. Democracy can only work and thrive with an educated and/or informed population who is willing and able to have public and civil discourse. The fact that the political climate is the way it is now, so divided and only engaging to act on petty revenges, allows for fascism to take root. We saw this in Germany prior to the second World War. When NSDAP began beating people up in the street who opposed their ideology, with little repercussions for such behavior, led to the beer hall putsch, and eventually the rise of Herr Hitler. I can see parallels with the modern day political climate of America. The issue is that we voted them into the white house; I think that might even be more jarring than them being in there itself. Democratically voting a fascist in power is a tell tale sign that our democracy is not working.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I need to do more protests . I always seem to hear about them after the event, or they’re always in London or something

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your state capitol building on Wednesday at noon. Every state.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Why are people still organizing outside building the oligarchs never go to? No wonder people don't show up, it doesn't work. Perhaps if we organized outside gated communities or billionaires mansions, occupy the oligarchs instead of some sidewalk.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (44 children)

Does this include not voting because one is a single issue voter?

Edit: lmao, yall will really say whatever to justify your decision to make things worse.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Absolutely. Non-voters and "protest" voters chose not to oppose a known fascist. Their refusal to strategically use their voice has led to increased suffering of minorities, LGBTQ+, and likely an end to any semblance of US democracy.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, well, they've done it, 95 million Americans didn't vote. Now what?

Are we gonna point the finger at them, lay the blame at their feet, and feel superior because WE VOTED, while the oligarchs and fascists loot our treasury and put our minority and LGBTQ+ brothers and sisters you seem to care so much about in camps? Or are we gonna go and fight the good fight like the people out in LA yesterday?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are we gonna point the finger at them, lay the blame at their feet,

Absolutely.

If those 95 million would've voted together for Mike the local crackhead, Mike would've won the popular vote with about 20 million votes to spare... I don't know, seems stupid to me to just go on the Internet to complain and then not use one of the only tools you have in a democracy?

I understand that going out voting is "accepting the system" but that is the only legal way to bring about change. If you don't want to support the system that's fine, work to dismantle it, take the fight to them. But just staying at home, doing nothing and then saying "I told you so" is just dumb.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand your point, but as you said:

But just staying at home, doing nothing and then saying "I told you so" is just dumb.

There are people WHO VOTED who are doing this, because it's "not their responsibility" anymore.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are people WHO VOTED who are doing this, because it's "not their responsibility" anymore.

There are a lot of people like this, they did the bare minimum and feel like that's enough, I mean at least it's something? Still far from enough, I agree with that.

In these times I often think about the Berthold Brecht poem "Wer Zuhause bleibt"-"Whoever stays at home".

Wer zu Hause bleibt, wenn der Kampf beginnt Und lässt andere kämpfen für seine Sache Der muss sich vorsehen: denn Wer den Kampf nicht geteilt hat Der wird teilen die Niederlage. Nicht einmal den Kampf vermeidet Wer den Kampf vermeiden will: denn Es wird kämpfen für die Sache des Feinds Wer für seine eigene Sache nicht gekämpft hat.

Translation :

Whoever stays at home when the fight begins and lets others fight for his cause must beware: For whoever has not shared the fight will share the defeat. Not even avoiding the fight helps anymore, because he who has not fought (for his own cause) has fought for the cause of the enemy.

Italics added by me

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Not only this but, if those non-voters organized and taken action in the last half-century, they would have been able to move the Overton to the Left, instead of the unending Right-ward crawl that we've been seeing. That could have prevented the likes of Clinton and Thatcher and erosion of workers' rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Thank you for also making this point. There's a lot of with to do. In-person protests, education and outreach, mutual aid and are some of the necessary avenues. Not everyone is able to march but there are many other ways to contribute to the fight.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›