this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
620 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6475 readers
3038 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We have 1 unisex bathroom (literally 1 toilet) on the entire campus here, tucked away in a corner. I only ended up finding it by accident in my 3rd year. I personally would be in favor of removing the distinction everywhere, but I doubt that's going to happen. There was some strange blowback from some people who didn't like the change. On one hand, it felt pretty weird considering 99% of students didn't even know of the existence of said toilet before, but it became clearer to me after seeing how it was communicated.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I went to a theatre a few months ago that had the bathroom setup with several stalls that had full floor to ceiling walls and doors and an open sink area. There was a wall blocking the view of the main entrance to the building, but it was open enough that, at least to me and granted I am a CIS white male, it seemed like a solid setup that didn't feel so isolating that were something to happen in there, someone would pretty quickly know.

I thought that style of setup should be the norm, honestly I think it's the weird stalls that don't actually block anything and have locks that 80% of the time are misaligned and broken that prevent us from having decent unisex bathrooms. Also, we don't need urinals they don't really save any room or anything.

The only other change I'd make with this setup is I'd probably have a separate room for baby changing stations just because the one example I had was small enough that if you had that in there, it would just be in the way of people trying to get in and out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one cares which port-a-potty you use (as long as it is unoccupied)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

All for it though it's best done when renovations are possible. Was at a place where they did it with multistall bathrooms and you had to guess which one had urinals.

Edit: of course could also just add a sign saying urinals here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There should be two restrooms. One with only stalls, one with only urinals. That way we get the efficiency gains of urinals (very important at football stadiums), and nobody has to see a dick if they don't want to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, I don't know who goes to public bathrooms to see dick. I don't even want to be in there in the first place. Seeing someone else's bits is pretty low on the list of things I want to see in there, right above shit smeared walls.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

At over 50 years old, I don't think I've ever seen another man's dick in a bathroom.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›