this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
532 points (98.2% liked)

World News

40327 readers
3463 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump rescinded sanctions imposed by the Biden administration on Israeli settler groups and individuals accused of violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

The sanctions, established under Executive Order 14115 in 2024, targeted those "undermining peace, security, and stability" and froze U.S. assets of sanctioned individuals.

This marks a reversal of Biden’s policy aimed at curbing settler violence and supporting a two-state solution.

Trump’s decision aligns with his previous support for Israeli settlements, which most countries consider illegal under international law.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 244 points 2 weeks ago (63 children)

At least we don't have Genocide Joe! (/s in case I actually need to write that)

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yea! We just had to teach bLueMagA a lesson at the polls this particular election cycle

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well the last elections had Bernie, so effort was spent on that option for change instead.

Funny how a decent choice of candidate can be the difference between promoting said candidate and promoting not voting at all. Almost like representation matters.

It’s analogous to sanctioning Pvt. Ivan McBlyat but leaving Putin untouched.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You fucked up, regardless of what you tell yourself now

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

And Lepards ate all of our faces, thanks progressives

load more comments (62 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

The 53 days have started.

And folks are holding this up as evidence that Trump is "better" on Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Excellent article. Thank you!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Hitler opened the meeting by boasting that millions of Germans had welcomed his chancellorship with “jubilation,” then outlined his plans for expunging key government officials and filling their positions with loyalists. At this point he turned to his main agenda item: the empowering law that, he argued, would give him the time (four years, according to the stipulations laid out in the draft of the law) and the authority necessary to make good on his campaign promises to revive the economy, reduce unemployment, increase military spending, withdraw from international treaty obligations, purge the country of foreigners he claimed were “poisoning” the blood of the nation, and exact revenge on political opponents. “Heads will roll in the sand,” Hitler had vowed at one rally.

Sounds about right in line

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

The only real way to curb settlers violence and support a two state solution is no more weapon at all to israel and global sanctions on the israeli state itself. Something the two genocidal parties would never do

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That would be nice. But one party’s voters think that Arabs deserve no quarter. The other party’s voters are somewhat split and nuanced on the issue. So if you want only zero funding for Israel, or no vote, you’re going to get the party who believes in no mercy, kill all Muslims, and annex all of Palestinian lands yesterday.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So, Israel bought a bunch of his coins?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

They planned all the way from Bibi's october visit

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Ding ding ding.

The existence of this coin is two fold.

  1. wash bribe money.
  2. Scam the voters.
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But I was told buy a guy at work that the war would be over within 24 hours!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I heard Kamala's policy is bad for Palestinian from here and also the Palestinian community in US. Happy now?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd sure be happy if we were just starting Bernie's second term. With third way neoliberalism still firmly in control of the Democrats, an eventual fall to fascists was inevitable. It just happened to be this election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I voted for Bernie twice. But he couldn’t even come close to beating Hillary when she’s was handcuffed to an fbi investigation. Also, it’s hilarious you think he wouldn’t lose a second term in a similar fashion to Carter vs Reagan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

The vast majority of people who criticized Kamala online still voted for her. They knew the cost.

The problem is voters who don't pay as close of attention, who only vote based on single issues, which we have a lot of in the USA.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

This will surely help peace.

load more comments
view more: next ›